Well, if complete neutrality is defined by the complete absence of any emotion, I don't really see how it could exist. But that wasn't even the main point I was driving at. My point is that everyone has emotions regardless (even psychopaths possess emotion in some capacity). So, I'm trying to ascertain what is really meant when people say to take emotions out of the equation to remain impartial or...objective, when clearly moments of insight to, say, grasp logic stems from types of emotion. I guess I'm approaching this from a more literalist perspective.