Quote:
Originally Posted by Prsartist3
Well she OFTEN talks about other clients but I don't see an issue because they were never named or identified. In this case the issue I had is although I don't believe my name was given out, she forced a face to face meeting, which I clearly had no interest in. Even if he doesn't know my name, he now has a face to attach to whatever info he was told about me. I'm absolutely sick to my stomach.
|
I understand what your issue is and, as I said, it is valid because what she did WAS a betrayal.
What I am saying is that there is an objective issue here in addition to your personal issue, and that is an objective breach of professional law and ethics when she talks about other clients even when she doesn't identify them. I don't care if she doesn't identify them when she talks about them. She can't do that. Period. She can talk about her clients WITHOUT identifying them only when she consults with her peers, not when she conducts therapy with her clients. Whether it's an issue for you or not it doesn't matter, sorry. Your opinion about this is irrelevant because whether you take an issue with it or not, she is still not allowed to do that by law.