I understand what your issue is and, as I said, it is valid because what she did WAS a betrayal.

What I am saying is that there is an objective issue here in addition to your personal issue, and that is an objective breach of professional law and ethics when she talks about other clients even when she doesn't identify them. I don't care if she doesn't identify them when she talks about them. She can't do that. Period. She can talk about her clients WITHOUT identifying them only when she consults with her peers, not when she conducts therapy with her clients. Whether it's an issue for you or not it doesn't matter, sorry. Your opinion about this is irrelevant because whether you take an issue with it or not, she is still not allowed to do that by law.