Blanche - I'm a bit confused by your apparent examples of psychoanalytic and humanistic therapies. Your first example is a perfect example of the person-centred way of working, which is absolutely humanistic and came about originally as a deliberate reaction against psychoanalysis - a new and different way of conducting talk therapy. It is now so ubiquitous that therapists of all types, including psychoanalysts, use it as a sort of 'base' for their therapy, but it is certainly not a specifically psychoanalytic way of working. The T in the example is aiming to paraphrase the client's words, with emphasis on the feelings they are experiencing. Doing as such is one of the foundations of person-centred therapy.

The second example I would not call humanistic, and as a humanistically trained therapist myself I would never respond to a client in that manner. It places a value judgement on the client which simply reinforces the idea that they exist to please others. Humanistic therapists do believe that everyone matters and deserves to be treated with compassion. We don't expect that simply telling people that is going to have much therapeutic benefit. It's more about showing them that. And yes, as you say, it takes time.

ETA: Reading your post again I notice you speak of CBT - perhaps you have the mistaken belief that CBT is a humanistic model of therapy? It is not. It belongs to the third category - behavioural. In fact it's almost the opposite of humanism.