This is the article I was referring to:
Confession 1

I actually found the Lott book somewhat useful, though certainly has problems. My comment was about literature/writing on transference in general. I find most of it idealized to the point of absurdity. It's mostly all the same, an omnipresent sort of propaganda. That's why I found the above article so jarring. It's highly critical and attempts to take the construct apart. Beware, heavy stuff.