View Single Post
 
Old Oct 20, 2017, 06:29 AM
Patagonia's Avatar
Patagonia Patagonia is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: In my own little world, NO trespassing!
Posts: 4,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by ciderguy View Post
You’re right, unless fetishism become partialism but I’ve not run across many.


Oh - ‘vanilla sub’: someone who is only occasionally dominated, and never with a dom who might make commands beyond what the vanilla sub would naturally do. A ‘vanilla sub’ never experiences the pleasure of pain and would never consent to, e.g., the dom’s eight-man gangbang.


Just a vanilla sub.


No I'm sorry I still don't understand this. It does not make ANY sense to me & ive been in the scene for awhile. This "definition" does not fit any long standing definitions of what bdsm is built on.
Maybe it's a regional term?.....or just a theory? Maybe you're thinking of TPE?

There's so many issues with just the term "vanilla sub". Their polar opposites actually. Let's not argue over definitions tho, I can see this getting difficult.
__________________
"Doubt is like dye. Once it spreads into the fabric of excuses you've woven, you'll never get rid of the stain."
Jodi Picoult

Last edited by Patagonia; Oct 20, 2017 at 06:56 AM. Reason: Spelling