To me this sounds typical human relationship stuff. But in therapy the expectations for both client and therapist are so weird and unrealistic that it gets confusing.

I think if a therapist creates a rupture, and this needs to be worked out in therapy, then the client should not have to pay for those sessions. Seriously.

There is something absurd about having to "work through" some drama created by the therapy relationship itself, adding to the list of problems the client has to deal with. Why bother? The usual answer would be something about "transference" that has no basis in reality.