Thank you for sharing that article. I am wondering if they have reversed cause and effect though. The article seems to imply that it's the interpretation and associations with psychotic phenomena that make a person clinically ill or not, but it could simply be that people who are clinically ill have negative life experiences associated with psychosis so they react to fake psychotic symptoms differently based on their life experience.

Still I am always happy to see some out of the box thinking on research in mental illness.