View Single Post
 
Old Sep 01, 2018, 11:44 PM
Ididitmyway's Avatar
Ididitmyway Ididitmyway is offline
Magnate
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by guileless View Post
I realize there is background to each situation, but this seems way too contradictory.

Here a therapist thinks it's a good idea to go to their client's facebook page, a public place, while if a client drives by their house on a public road, another therapist thinks the relationship must end.
If you want to make a fair comparison, you have to compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges.

If you are a client and your therapist drives by your house on a public road not accidentally but intentionally, I really hope you'd end therapy with them. The same applies to therapists. So, in this situation therapists and clients are also on the equal level, there is no contradiction and no hypocrisy here. Whether you are a client or a therapist, if you decide to check out where your therapist/client lives and if you do it more than once, it's officially considered stalking. It's not like people "choose" to put their houses out there for public view. All houses stay in public view unless you are rich enough to live in a secluded gated community. So, people don't really have an option to "hide" where they live. But they do have a choice of making their personal information public online and they do have a choice of how much they want to put for a public view. So, the rules are the same for therapists and clients. Googling is ok for both, stalking is not ok for both, so I don't see any hypocrisy here.
__________________
www.therapyconsumerguide.com

Bernie Sanders/Tulsi Gabbard 2020
Thanks for this!
elisewin