Quote:
Originally Posted by Xynesthesia
I think I mentioned before on the forum... for me, Dr. Ramani is someone I would immediately consider based on interviews online. I watched a lot of MedCircle episodes and everything with Dr. Ramani in them, and signed up because I generally liked the Med Circle topics and style. There is something like an initial therapy session simulated(?) between Dr. Ramani and the host, available to only members I believe, and it just further convinced me about my initial good impressions and how fitting she might be for me.
Just an example about a discussion on BPD (which is not my concern or diagnosis at all):
Or issues around food:
This is a professional I would strongly consider hiring, based on online info. |
She's a great speaker; her personality and communication style is very appealing. But for me, the content of what she is saying is very unappealing. I couldn't listen to her more than 3 minutes.
She thinks in terms of symptoms more than structure, and i'm the opposite.
Overall, she's much too surfacey, and the way she views things reminds me of the ways of thinking demonstrated on the blogs on this site. Which likely just means that I feel strongly about object relations and the psychodynamic way of thinking. I agree with most of what she said about BPD but not everything.
Although night and day for me, I can see where she would appeal to others.