Member
Member Since Feb 2019
Location: New York
Posts: 307
|
Feb 24, 2019 at 07:16 PM
Possible trigger:
I read 4 articles today, more articles than usual. Though I guess the extra articles compensated for weeks when there were barely any articles to read.
The first article was about a father who sexually violated his child. The father even joked about raping another woman. He took the child to brothels to try to fix her sexuality/gender. If I were to offend a lady, my child would be the last one to offend. I'm not into children. maybe the now-transgendered daughter misinterpreted her father's rough approach to parenting and father-son relationship., but I still wouldn't care too much about my own child's sexuality to the point where I'm sexually offending my own child. And I wouldn't visit brothels with my son, as prostitution is illegal where I live and so I'd be introducing him to illegal activity.
The second article was about sexual assault allegations from a lady who became unconscious after a drink. when she gained consciousness, the man pushed her down and unclothed her. this incident involved drinking and alcohol, which is a pattern I'm noticing. luckily I don't drink and I understand that drinking makes sexual situations very dangerous. A long time ago, I resolved to not date any lady who drinks.
The third article was about a man who sexually assaulted a lady while giving her some massage during a "healing session." After the massage, she texted that she was pleased with the service. but later on, she felt uncomfortable about it. The man used the text as evidence against her claim. This is an example of workplace harassment, where i follow two rule (1) no touching and (2) no sex talk. Massaging requires touching, but there's an obvious line between massaging and sexual assault. And regardless of whether or not she was satisfied by the experience, sexual misconduct is sexual misconduct. His services also aimed to target "female energy," so he was probably only massaging women or intending to only massage women. If I ever massage, I'd massage all people regardless of gender. I'd probably also videotape the massages as evidence against claims like that, with the client's consent of course.
I've read some articles where women continue to positively communicate with their sexual offenders. But I'm realizing that a man is safest avoiding adverse sexual situations, regardless of whether women don't speak out against those situations; because some men are ultimately at fault if those situations are publicized. Then there's the chance that a woman would snare men, by pretending to privately accept sexual behavior and then denouncing them. Some women are discriminant and can destroy men just as much as other people have.
The fourth extra article was about some prostitution investigation. A famous man was arrested for patronizing a spa that secretly provided prostitution. The cops recognized sexual slang being used on some online review of the spa. they then noticed, in a 24-hour surveliance, that only men were accessing the spa, even though some advertised spa services were for women. the cops stopped two men who were leaving the spa and found out that those two men had been clients of sexual services. they then planted cameras and recorded evidence of men at the spa being sexually stimulated, although there wasn't any sexual intercourse. I already know that prostitution is illegal, so I would've avoided that spa. I wouldn't even visit a strip club because I know the chance of being in an illegal sexual encounter would then increase. a lo of men online have told me to hire prostitutes or escorts whenever I was anxious, and maybe they were legally fine to do so. But my city doesn't tolerate prostitution and I've avoided jail many times in my life by not being a customer of prostitution.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|