I just don’t believe this is the correct place to create a hierarchy of those who seem “most supportive” or whatever the criteria may be.

I think the kuddos thread is just great so are the number of times people get a thanks / like.

I think it’s the hierarchy type system that’s putting me off. Who would vote? You could have 50 members nominated in one month. So who would decide? And what about the other 49 who were nominated?

The other part is logistics. There are thousands of members and thousands of posts. Who would sit reading through all this?

Maybe it’s even the term Honours that is putting me off. It’s a term used in the academic field and does create a system of those who have achieved vs those who have not achieved.

It’s also subjective. Who one person may nominate, 10 other members could totally disagree, for a myriad of reasons.