View Single Post
Open Eyes
Legendary Wise Elder
 
Open Eyes's Avatar
 
Member Since Mar 2011
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 23,134 (SuperPoster!)
13
21.4k hugs
given
PC PoohBah!
Default Jun 20, 2019 at 04:14 PM
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverTrees View Post
Marriage is different from commitment though, right? You can have both but you don't have to have marriage in order to commit and raise healthy children. In the Netherlands for example, it is more common for couples to cohabitate and raise their children that way....they don't see the point of the document or party. For a long time there were all sorts of notions about why priests cannot marry. Historically it's because the Catholic Church did not want their land entailed away to children of priests if the children did not choose the priesthood. Historically, marriage evolved in order to for people to acquire in-laws....that was a very important source of power back in the day....combining two powerful families.

I'm all for marriage if individuals choose it and want it for themselves. What I disagree with are the myths in society as to why it developed and why it continues to be pushed on young folks ($53 billion industry in the U.S.).

With regard to raising children, marriage remains the "norm" or desirable in many societies but rates of parental child abuse and neglect are still very high.

Are you saying that institutionalized marriage contributed to the development of childhood vaccines @openeyes?
No, not saying that institutionalized marriage contributed to the development of childhood vaccines.

Marriage and family was important for different reasons in human history, many early settlements needed families to work together on farms. Many farms stayed in famiies for generations too. Many businesses were family owned and run too.
Open Eyes is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 
Hugs from:
Anonymous44076