Quote:
Originally Posted by susannahsays
But I think if you had said something more about it, that would actually have been a reason for him to not do it. If that makes sense. He's doing it on his own terms after establishing that he won't do it just because you ask. That is actually different than if he had just done it to begin with, or if there had been further discussion about it and he had started doing it in response to that. He has had his say, so he has asserted himself and can do whatever without feeling controlled. So I'm not sure it can be reduced down to implying that he has basically done a 180 - that's not how I see it, anyway. I think lots of times people will make concessions after communicating their reservations.
Basically, what I'm saying is that I wouldn't assume that the reason he is now standing is because he didn't realize it was important before and now he does. Jmo - and I'm only pointing it out because it seems like setting yourself up for disappointment to rationalize his actions as dependent on understanding how important something is to you (not without him telling you that is what happened).
|
Hm, OK. You make some good points. I think it's just confusing that he was all, "I'm not going to do that just because you asked me to" then started doing it. So in your opinion, why is he doing it now then? Why not just hold to his word? It's partly, too, that if he forgets and sits down (like if I paid at the beginning), then he'll be like "oh right" and stand up, without my saying anything. I guess I just don't get why he'd be OK with it now, unless it was literally just about his back and that's doing better now. Plus the fact that he joked about it regarding the fish--he knows it was a thing for me.