John Nash's "Braess' paradox" sounds oddly just like what I'm describing or do I just not understand it? I can't be bothered much lol..

That's the problem with my P and not J personality trait @ Atypical Disaster.. But I haven't looked at the cognition things yet.. I will soon.. Just so much I'm doing..

Edit: No it was "Nash equilibrium" and then "Braess' paradox" was a step up from that? idk.. They both look similar to the "thing" about reality that I can't explain and religious people and atheists don't seem to understand..