People like to believe that they're more consistent and moral than they actually are. They can write off behaviors they dislike about themselves as "exceptions" even if there seem to be a lot of exceptions. Most people don't live according to their values, but act on instinct and out of emotion as things come up. I think most people fake the majority of their social interactions, and they only dislike "fake" people because they're envious.

It's what makes understanding morality for me so difficult that I just gave up on trying to be moral. Everyone has their own rigid do's and don't's, but few people actually follow them. I think people really don't care as much about these things as they claim to. Whenever I rely on the good will of others, I'm normally disappointed. When I rely on their selfishness, things always tend to work out for me. Sometimes it makes me really wonder, as somebody with AsPD, if everyone else is a sociopath, too, and they're just better at faking emotion than I am. They seem to be just as egocentric, to me, but perhaps less aware or accepting of their egocentrism.

I'm sorry if my perspective offends anyone. I'm probably not able to see the whole picture clearly. To me, though, it seems like the only thing that sort of keeps most people in check is guilt. Even then, most people seem to choose to deal with some amount of guilt to benefit themselves, or offer myopic rationalizations to defend whatever behavior they dislike. I think the vast majority of people are True Neutral, and the people who claim to care about not being "two-faced" will normally change their tone if being "two-faced" is something easy they can do to benefit themselves. Maybe afterwards they feel guilty or rationalize it, but again they're mostly acting on instinct and not really thinking through their choices.