Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Coyote
Patients are assured the right to not take meds in this state. There is a huge advocacy group for this.
I generally agree. However, this is causing a huge problems within our newly built, thoughtfully staffed state hospital. The staff have all been seriously injured, are out on WC/ LTD/SSDI now and we keep it staffed by importing traveling nurses, etc. This provides zero consistency in the care, treatment and discharge planning for patients interested in stabilizing and returning to the community.
What to do?
|
I am sorry to hear that. Working in any state hospital system is inherently dangerous, but if you throw in a bunch of people who become dangerous when unmedicated, well, that just sounds like a complete cluster. I personally knew a fellow while I was in the hospital with schizophrenia who is a complete gentleman when properly medicated. Harmless. When not medicated properly, he kills people, because he believes everyone is trying to harm him. So, he stays medicated--needless to say. He is doing great.
That's the way it is for some folks.
I was unfortunately in our state hospital for a very long time. Long, sad story. The staff on the maximum security side live in terror. One was killed a few years ago during a takedown. Had a heart attack and died there on the floor in Harbors. So sad. As a result, staff often don't provide very good patient care there now, because their fear rules their actions and creates a huge barrier between them and their patients.
At the end of the day, both staff and patients must be protected. It is the only way those hospitals have a chance to do any good.