View Single Post
 
Old May 25, 2020, 04:46 PM
fern46 fern46 is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Member Since: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirdDancer View Post
I did like Joker, but felt that mental illness was just a small side story in that movie. I saw it as making a much more political and socialogical statement. I felt the use of a mental illness in that story was more as an analogy. One that just so happened to work better than if the movie's hero had cancer. Perhaps if the mental illness in that movie was more familiar and accurately portrayed, it would have fail in its intended purpose. Obviously, for some it failed and others not.

I did not see the Joker as the bad character in that movie. The figurative "Wayne's" were the bad ones. People can just forget about the whole Joker portrayal in all the Batman comic books and mega money making movies. It is common for the oppressed to be portrayed as bad. Frig Batman! I sympathized with the Joker, in this case! Those who didn't, did not get the movie in the way I did. Many who didn't could be the same oppressed that vote for their oppressors. The question will be, when do those people realize their real oppressors and revolt?
I just saw the movie. I'm not sure exactly how I feel about it.

Just an alternate perspective, but for me there is no bad guy. There's judgment of polarization. I think both sides demonstrate the effects of imbalance. The forgotten and then the stars who are rats. Does anybody naturally seek to be either? Can we integrate both and find a way forward? The one or the other mentality is not the only choice. Revolution also means to spin around. I'm bored with this loop. I feel it is time to shift course altogether. I choose neither. And both.

What is your favorite BBQ/grill food?