This is not a question of people taking decisions lightly or with thought. This is about instances of people being able to convince themselves that they are an exception to the rules which are in place for all. Meeting with others (when remote contact is possible even if it is not preferable) increases the risk of future waves of the virus. This is not judgement, it is epidemiological fact.

BACP are very clear in their guidance: "Our advice, which takes account of general advice to the public across all the nations, is that you should continue working remotely with clients wherever possible. The virus is still just as contagious and potentially fatal while there is no vaccine". If remote working isn't possible, there might be argument for face to face work. If remote working is simply not the preferred means of contact, I am struggling to see what the justification can be.

As much as it goes against our liberal outlook, this situation needs wider consideration than just our personal preference and pain.