Quote:
Originally Posted by BethRags
I'm confused, I think...not exactly sure what your first paragraph means.
I'm saying that - in my state, anyway - it seems azz-backwards to open retail, restaurants, salons, gyms, etc. - but healthcare remains largely inaccessible.
|
I was just saying that I don't think it's a legislative decision. I could be wrong since I don't know where you live and I obviously don't know everything and the circumstances in every state. I guess I was interpreting that you were angry at people making policies that allow people to go to bars but still don't allow you to get therapy. I don't think that's what is happening because I don't think there was ever a policy made by the same people who are now allowing bars to be opened regulating whether you are allowed to see your therapist. I think the person or people making decisions about that has always ultimately been your therapist or the clinic. Since your therapist/clinic did not decide to allow people to go to bars, the gym, etc., it doesn't really make sense to say that their individual decision is azz backwards - because they had nothing to do with making those calls. They can only control what they choose to do.
Decisions made by different entities will not always be in alignment because they don't usually have the same concerns. One entity has made a decision based on one set of circumstances and the other makes a decision on a completely different set of circumstances. If hairdressers could somehow cut hair remotely, they probably would.