Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostislost
I told my therapist that I thought it was 'normal' for some clients to fantasize about having sex with their T. He said yes, but that it wasn't really about him, just transference.
I get that this would normally be the case, but if it could never be about him, then is it because he isn't really there? Like the real him. Do they leave their true selves at the door to protect themselves from the things we say and do to them?
I did ask him and he said he was his real self, but it's not something they could really admit to I suppose.
|
I have always told my therapists that they should be or i wish they were actually machines. i have no friends and i can’t help feeling that if i am in a room with an actual living being that that person is a viable candidate for being a friend. if that is contrary to therapy then i am more inclined to seek the friendship part over the therapy. i think friendship is more valuable and productive than therapy. they just ignore that i say stuff like that and i can still feel the vibrations coming out of their conflicted heads so i end up being troubled all the more that they are troubled too. so being a machine i think really would be better. and as for “transference” in my opinion that is such a BS terminology. i’ll explain if asked.
but i’m very happy that you brought this subject up. its always on my mind. thanks.
Sarah,