Thread: Dr was right?
View Single Post
 
Old Oct 17, 2020, 09:26 AM
fern46 fern46 is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Member Since: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabyunbound View Post
I have to respectfully disagree. I've been on a static regimen for some 5 years, have episodes only(?) about 2-3 times a year, and each time either my AP is temporarily increased or an additional AP is temporarily prescribed. This is how my pdoc roles and I like it. If my current regimen is working, then let's leave it alone and only make temporary changes when needed. In any case, what works for me may well not work for others.
I think both are true. It feels like a semantics thing. If you're changing things up a few times a year I wouldn't consider that static even though the core of the regimen remains unchanged. I will let him speak for himself, but I took him to mean that the neurochemical makeup shifts from time to time requiring intervention or a change of some kind to then return us to balance. I didn't assume it to mean that couldn't also include situations where people use prn meds and then go back to the cocktail that works for them the majority of the time.

I have a similar deal going on with my pdoc. I don't take anything normally and then go back to a low dose AP when needed until things calm down. That system works for me so far, and I like it a lot. I'm glad you found something similar that works. For me at least, it keeps me from worrying about needing to constantly shift the recipe for success and I take comfort knowing there's always a plan to address temporary blips.
Hugs from:
Gabyunbound
Thanks for this!
*Beth*