Quote:
Originally Posted by Molinit
None of that indicates there was an agreement on BOTH sides. It indicates that by discussing these things he is ASSUMING they have an agreement.
|
Even the courts don't expect you to have made everything formally explicit, they do use realistic assumptions to be able to make a judgment about a case. Based on what OP already described, it would be dishonest behaviour for the woman to use the idea of "this wasn't an explicit agreement" as an excuse for anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Molinit
Did you ever have the conversation where you clearly stated you are not going to date or see anyone else? Because very early on, she clearly told you she isn't fully committed to you. Unless you had the conversation with both of you deciding not to see anyone else, she still isn't committed to you and asking about people posting to her Instagram is inappropriate.
|
Thought about this again. I think, this woman is obviously aware that this guy wants an exclusive relationship as that has been communicated already, fully explicitly too based on the first post of OP. The woman is also aware that OP associates regular sex with an exclusive relationship, as well as words and behaviours about being in love, including talking about the future. Just like most people do too. So if she seriously thinks that she's still not committed then she has a responsibility to inform OP of this as soon as she does/enters into anything that OP would see as part of an exclusive relationship. Doesn't look like she's done that kind of informing at all.