It makes difference if you have tangible evidence that you can present to argue over a bad review. Like if they said you turned a project two days late but you have a time stamp that shows it was on time. If there is no tangible evidence or artifact proving otherwise, they won’t change a review. Unfortunately just saying something it’s not likely to make a difference.

We are allowed to argue over all and every points in a review but you have to demonstrate something that contradicts what’s on a review. Examples, evidence, artifacts. Otherwise they’ll let you argue and send you on
your merry way. They won’t change anything. You could put together a list of tangible things you did well and send them