![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
What if I told you that I/we was made to deal with our co workers in a 2nd job while at work, indirectly. If you keep an open mind you follow me in what I'm describing. I/we went through this big example of this . Our coworker without anyones knowledge mine or theirs where used as reminders in my life outside of work, like strategically. Is this parts work? How many helpers do I need? I had to deal with this where I was employed the last couple years. Like how could they talk with my parts and no one has a clue this going to happen. I will give a good example. This is not only the workplace but mostly the workplace because other than home that is most time is spent.
I sued an employer for unpaid wages. I worked 27 hours first two days training next three days call taking as a telemarketer offering energy supplier cost savings. Of course, only a week im relatively new I'm not an expert in the job. According, to my legal representation the contract lingo was incorrect I should have been paid for hours worked the base pay of $8 per hour. I was fired correctly 3 sales then you can't keep a job at the company. Fair enough cool, it was a unpaid wage claim. So the cross examination from the defendants goes into questions that wasn't relevant to the matter at hand. Almost unbeknownst to him he was giving me/us advice on our everyday life. Appropriateness Foundation Transferable skills Belittled me almost like a parent (my interpretation not his works) Can I read in several times? Almost like how dare you try to seek justice your weak and this will only be you...Like I haven't had any fight in me. Specifics reworded questions to and played on my anger and then I don't care no more. He didn't use context clues at all. Like for instance, if someone says I need to get a drink of water. Then asks why do you need a drink of water, what type of water tap or bottle, what cup will you use. Like a need to explain it...Then turns around ask the question a different way only to get the same results. I'm a disability recipient, and this intertwined of data too me/us is like a society code of messages(What my parts got from those terms he used is (I think you created your first part at 11 years old to my knowledge, why did you tell your mom it was inappropriate, Your expecting back pay make sure you get a house with good foundation, you have transferable skills get a job, why can't u make a sale, Like now your dumb because I have answered the read question twice then others answers are no, why was aligned mentioned this isn't a matter of God speaking to me), and to us not really relevant to the matter at hand unpaid wages. It was eerily reminiscent to what I dealt with on jobs that ultimately lead to me being a disability recipient. Indeed a definitely set back an only makes me want to stay at home and not do anything else productive with my life. The threat of splitting or creating a persona to deal with this overwhelming abuse is terrible. Add on the fact that those I may also discover in the process of this outlandish process is quiet weird. I also have psychosis and I'm not sure if they inability to separate true meaning from parallels is why I got that diagnoses well I'm not sure. My anxiety stayed back and I seem to get the personalities that was able to handle being in a court on the stand next to a judge answer questions from two lawyers. It was no problem in that regard. I/we also got an opportunity to get made and show anger in a tasteful way when I repeated no to the can you 3rd read question when I answered the previous two yes already. Every question after that was No, so I pretty much shut down....Nearly walking out of the court room. I don't care what today's decision is it was only $216! Or $723 if ruled in my favor |
![]() Anonymous48690
|
![]() amandalouise
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Im surprised your lawyer did not object to all this. when a lawyer "objects" the judge makes the lawyer rephrase their questions and stop belittling\badgering the person doing the testifying, when lawyers "object" the judge makes the lawyers stay on topic of what the case is (in this case the topic is why you are entitled to the back pay or not because you did or didnt do what the telemarketing job required you to do) my suggestion is contact your lawyer and ask him to explain why things happened the way they did and why he did not object when the defense was doing this to you. only your lawyer can answer to these things. Again I'm sorry this happened to you. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
My lawyer only knew that I was disabled. She objected but he keep going on with right wing questions. I guess she got tired of objecting. We don't have lawyers in our system and if we did there is not a reason in the world I could think of to bring them out outside of session. So, I'm not sure who was being tried. I didn't go to school to be a lawyer or at all if I know a term or two that's it.. I'm not sure who is trying to figour out did but it sure is someone who needs to stay in there lane. Review cameras in that court house.
|
Reply |
|