![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Jerome Kagan's review of a book by Samuel Barondes is not kind. Barondes thesis has two main parts:
The narrative rests on two ideas. The first, which is in accord with evidence, but is given the least attention, is that each person’s genetic makeup makes an important contribution to his or her personality. Few scientists would quarrel with that declaration. Barondes acknowledges that the available evidence is too sparse to permit any firm conclusions regarding a relationship between any gene, or genes, and any known personality trait because a person’s experiences not only control the form that an inherited trait assumes but also influence the level of gene expression.The rest of Kagan's review itemizes what he views as the book's deficiencies. To me, a review of this type is not atypical. So much is going on in the mental health field and there is so much more to learn. It is not surprising there are disagreements. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
ah the environmental and the genetic (hereditary) theories are still fresh.
![]() as for my former alcoholism and bipolar tho, "the genes (ayes) have it". just my humble opinion but i feel my basic personality is based on the conditional learned behaviors that occured during my formative years. after that everything got tacked onto that info causing my viewpoints and personality traits. some of which i've needed to change to cope with life in a more healthy way. the previous /early childhood info became painful to say the least.
__________________
Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish, in lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. The world you desired can be won. It exists, it is real, it is possible, it is yours..~Ayn Rand |
Reply |
|