![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Veteran Member
Member Since Mar 2011
Location: amongst the stars
Posts: 572
13 68 hugs
given |
#1
Over the past decade or so, I have become habitually accustomed to reading through long online discussion threads, but am getting headaches the last couple years from all of the debating. Most of these debates boil down to hairsplitting exercises. The debaters agree with each other 90% of the way, but will go back and forth for pages about the 10% disagreement. The other debates where they disagree 100% have become headache-inducing to me as well. Plus I think sarcasm has become overused as a way to make one's point online. What do you think? Can anyone relate? Are my headaches just a symptom of one who hates the free interchange of ideas?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Anonymous200200, Anonymous48690, IowaFarmGal
|
Grand Poohbah
Member Since Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,954
10 4 hugs
given |
#2
This seems consistent with boredom, and who can blame you; Most of these debates boil down to hairsplitting exercises
|
![]() |
![]() |
Grand Magnate
Member Since Aug 2013
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 3,535
11 993 hugs
given ![]() |
#3
__________________ Helping to create a kinder, gentler world by flinging poo. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ManOfConstantSorrow
|
![]() Koko2, lizardlady
|
Member
Member Since Jan 2015
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 99
9 11 hugs
given |
#4
It's not just you. I find that most of the time when people are arguing with me online, it's over semantics.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
#5
You're probably getting headaches due to unrealistic expectations. The people on the Internet are not lawyers, and the Internet is not a court of law.
Your headaches will go away when you view the Internet as an online version of "The Jerry Springer Show." |
![]() |
![]() Koko2
|
Veteran Member
Member Since Mar 2011
Location: amongst the stars
Posts: 572
13 68 hugs
given |
#6
Quote:
![]() I'll just mention that these headaches happen even browsing through discussions that I have no part in. Even my eyeballs will start throbbing with pain before long. I used to like browsing through pages of it, but not any more. I mean, no one talks like that to one another in real life. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
#7
Sounds like a case of eye strain. How much time a day do you stare at the screen hun?
|
![]() |
![]() Koko2
|
Member
Member Since Dec 2012
Location: The West Coast
Posts: 160
11 27 hugs
given |
#8
Ugh, YES. Barely-suppressed dismay incoming:
I used to check facebook multiple times a day. What can I say? I was a member when it was beta and/or just up, when it was still cultist and you could only sign up when you declared the college you were CURRENTLY going into. Ah, the days. ...And thus, professional procrastinator via it all through school. XD Anyways, because of this, it took me a long while - too long - to realize every time that I finished taking a look at it recently, most of the time I'd end up super irritated or another unpleasant flavor. ...The psychology going around is that fb can depress people when they start comparing their lives to the unrealistic facades that so many project to each other. ...Nope - that is, not for me. ...It's everyone **tc*ing at everything and everyone so vehemently that they've beaten dead horses and revived them all so many times that there is now a horse-zombie invasion stampeding barbarously feral and unchecked across the Internet! (top ten weirdest metaphors I've used?!) I also have a compulsive comment-reading habit for articles and such...just plain curiosity. It used to be for perusing unique opinions, ideas I hadn't considered, with the occasional naysayer/kid with a keyboard...Potential education. Now, everyone is hackles-up with bated breath, just aching for an opportunity to perpetrate a textual lashing. Convicting, hopelessly serious devil's advocates and arbitrarily politically-correcting super-analyzers abound, many wearing the guise of humanitarians watching out for the every-person via intense judgement and poor reading and comprehension skills. Some of my "favs" are when someone chews a user out for being judgmental, then negatively judges that user in the last sentence. ...If people over-analyzed words and phrases and reacted as disgustingly and nastily as they do online in "real" life, Earth would be little more than a radioactive gas giant by now. I've had to give myself a personal rule to almost never cruise comments anymore on articles. I've stopped going to certain sites entirely, because the rabid users have actually battered the site into changing things for that one collective opinion. It's sad. Just this morning, I read an article no longer than 150 words featuring simply a massive fish that was caught and released by a guy. A living marvel. ...A single comment. Paraphrasing: "A**h***. It should be released." . . . . . ![]() As a somewhat unrelated aside, and ironic considering it is nitpicky: As an anti-social and stereotypically geeky human that has lived inside of the internet as much as "irl" at this point (:P), I am driven hyperbolically insane that everyone uses "troll" incorrectly now, too. I guess this isn't really off topic now that I've gotten going here, if you stick with me til the end, I promise this nitpick has a reason... XD "Troll" started out meaning someone, a user, that purposefully incites a reaction in a conversation, OR someone that sort of digitally pulls another user's leg, gets their goat; the latter, if done "correctly", being unbeknownst to the targeted user to start. These are meant to be pretty much harmless interactions. A practical joke where no one gets hurt - an "I see what you did there..." gag. A silly example would be: Q: "Has anyone read [this book?]" A: "Yes. It really got to me when John Doe dies in chapter nine." (...When John Doe doesn't actually die.), and the answerer keeps posting bogus info. ...In a way, it's almost a sideways tactic to weed out the flamers...("Flaming" is quite different from trolling, albeit only a marginally different topic.) Of course, there are bad apples - those trolls would be folks that might respond to that question "jokingly" with "Wow, you must be dumb, under twelve, or both if you like that book. Are you serious?" It's also a flame, if meant truly. This is also just being a meanie-head. With this original (ahem, PROPER ![]() Argument and debate do not a conversation make. I mentioned it briefly above, but COMPREHENSION is getting worse and worse. And, I'm sure a lot of it is not just "lack of comprehension" skills per se, but instead/also poor or too-fast reading. The amount of opinionated conflagration would drop instantly if people actually read, and really read what they were attacking so ferociously instead of snapping at trigger-words. ...I haven't used facebook for months. __________________ Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Koko2
|
Junior Member
Member Since Feb 2015
Location: home
Posts: 12
9 1 hugs
given |
#9
Quote:
I lolled when I read this. So true! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Member
Member Since Dec 2011
Location: California
Posts: 326
12 11 hugs
given |
#10
Usually the most I'll do is ask someone a question, but I don't participate in the discussions beyond that. Life's too short, and I've had enough drama in my own life.
__________________ "My own mind is my own Church." - Thomas Paine |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Koko2
|
Veteran Member
Member Since Mar 2011
Location: amongst the stars
Posts: 572
13 68 hugs
given |
#11
Nowadays if someone tries to bate me into a debate after I post just a simple question or comment, I'll avoid responding because I know where it's heading. And I may just put them on my ignore list which can come in handy for peace of mind.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Nihil
|
Veteran Member
Member Since Mar 2011
Location: amongst the stars
Posts: 572
13 68 hugs
given |
#12
|
![]() |
![]() |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
#13
I don't really debate online. I have noticed that some people don't seem to understand words they use a lot of the time. They might use a word thinking it means one thing and it actually means something else. That makes it hard to converse with certain people.
|
![]() |
Legendary Wise Elder
Member Since Dec 2003
Location: Coram Deo
Posts: 35,474
(SuperPoster!)
20 1,651 hugs
given ![]() |
#14
I wonder if there's a component of OCD for those who feel like they just have to read a full thread and discussion?
![]() ![]() __________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|