FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
#1
I don't know anything about this because I've never had kids, but was wondering if it's possible that a mother could forge her husband's name on an acknowledgment of paternity form to get the husband's name on the birth certificate even though the mother knew it wasn't his kid? Say the husband was upset because he didn't think the child was his, so he left the room. Doesn't a witness have to be present with both people signing (or not signing?) How strict are they with this procedure?
|
Reply With Quote |
Legendary
Member Since Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,950
(SuperPoster!)
12 5,478 hugs
given |
#2
In certain states no matter who the "donor" is the husband is automatically considered the father, even if separated.
__________________ Dx: Me- SzA Husband- Bipolar 1 Daughter- mood disorder+ Comfortable broken and happy "So I don't know why I'm tongue tied At the wrong time when I need this."- P!nk My blog |
Reply With Quote |
Grand Magnate
Member Since Dec 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,624
12 3,238 hugs
given |
#3
I've had children in Washington and California, there was the midwife as the witness at the signing of the birth certificates in both states while the father and I signed. I do wonder though, what if a father is not present, can the mother put his name without him being there, I'd assume so because that probably happens a lot - the father absent at birth.
|
Reply With Quote |
Grand Poohbah
Member Since Feb 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 1,730
15 183 hugs
given |
#4
If the mother is legally married the husband is assumed to be the father of the baby in many states and Washington DC. The husband's presence is not required to list his name on the birth certificate because the legal marriage automatically makes the husband the legal father. In washington state if you are not married and the father of the baby wants to be listed on the birth certificate you need to have both parents sign a form in the presence of a notary. Birth certificates can be changed in the case of mistaken paternity. If the mother is married and her lover is the genetic father of the baby it is possible that the husband can legally block the lover from having any contact with the child. Legally that child is his, and genetics doesn't matter. I have seen it happen where the father finds out about the affair, divorces wife, and then WINS CUSTODY of all the children.
You do not need to be the genetic father of the children in a relationship to be legally required to pay child support. If you raised the kids with your wife and found out the kids were not yours in a later divorce, the fact that you legally were their parent still obligates you to pay support. I know this is the case in washington. These laws were written before we knew about genetics and DNA, and before sperm donors, egg donors, and surrogates came about. I suspect laws will change with time to accommodate genetic parents and give them more legal rights. We may end up with more than two legal parents of a child being possible. __________________ "Unipolar is boring! Go Bipolar!" Amazonmom is not putting up with bad behavior any more. |
Reply With Quote |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
#5
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|