Home Menu

Menu



advertisement
Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Anonymous32911
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Oct 18, 2012 at 05:23 PM
  #1
I don't know anything about this because I've never had kids, but was wondering if it's possible that a mother could forge her husband's name on an acknowledgment of paternity form to get the husband's name on the birth certificate even though the mother knew it wasn't his kid? Say the husband was upset because he didn't think the child was his, so he left the room. Doesn't a witness have to be present with both people signing (or not signing?) How strict are they with this procedure?
  Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Victoria'smom
Legendary
 
Victoria'smom's Avatar
 
Member Since Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,950 (SuperPoster!)
12
5,478 hugs
given
PC PoohBah!
Default Oct 20, 2012 at 01:10 AM
  #2
In certain states no matter who the "donor" is the husband is automatically considered the father, even if separated.

__________________
Dx:
Me- SzA
Husband- Bipolar 1
Daughter- mood disorder+


Comfortable broken and happy

"So I don't know why I'm tongue tied At the wrong time when I need this."- P!nk
My blog
Victoria'smom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
BlueInanna
Grand Magnate
 
BlueInanna's Avatar
 
Member Since Dec 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,624
12
3,238 hugs
given
PC PoohBah!
Default Oct 23, 2012 at 11:17 PM
  #3
I've had children in Washington and California, there was the midwife as the witness at the signing of the birth certificates in both states while the father and I signed. I do wonder though, what if a father is not present, can the mother put his name without him being there, I'd assume so because that probably happens a lot - the father absent at birth.
BlueInanna is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Amazonmom
Grand Poohbah
 
Amazonmom's Avatar
 
Member Since Feb 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 1,730
15
183 hugs
given
PC PoohBah!
Default Oct 25, 2012 at 07:11 PM
  #4
If the mother is legally married the husband is assumed to be the father of the baby in many states and Washington DC. The husband's presence is not required to list his name on the birth certificate because the legal marriage automatically makes the husband the legal father. In washington state if you are not married and the father of the baby wants to be listed on the birth certificate you need to have both parents sign a form in the presence of a notary. Birth certificates can be changed in the case of mistaken paternity. If the mother is married and her lover is the genetic father of the baby it is possible that the husband can legally block the lover from having any contact with the child. Legally that child is his, and genetics doesn't matter. I have seen it happen where the father finds out about the affair, divorces wife, and then WINS CUSTODY of all the children.

You do not need to be the genetic father of the children in a relationship to be legally required to pay child support. If you raised the kids with your wife and found out the kids were not yours in a later divorce, the fact that you legally were their parent still obligates you to pay support. I know this is the case in washington.

These laws were written before we knew about genetics and DNA, and before sperm donors, egg donors, and surrogates came about. I suspect laws will change with time to accommodate genetic parents and give them more legal rights. We may end up with more than two legal parents of a child being possible.

__________________
"Unipolar is boring! Go Bipolar!"

Amazonmom is not putting up with bad behavior any more.
Amazonmom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Anonymous35535
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Oct 27, 2012 at 11:24 AM
  #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquarius8 View Post
I don't know anything about this because I've never had kids, but was wondering if it's possible that a mother could forge her husband's name on an acknowledgment of paternity form to get the husband's name on the birth certificate even though the mother knew it wasn't his kid? Say the husband was upset because he didn't think the child was his, so he left the room. Doesn't a witness have to be present with both people signing (or not signing?) How strict are they with this procedure?
Many states don't require two signatures. Had my child in PA, sixteen years ago and it was not needed.
  Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply
attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.