Home Menu

Menu


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Apr 07, 2014, 12:13 PM
Bill3 Bill3 is offline
Legendary
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 10,967
"Australia’s highest court found that the 1995 Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act (New South Wales) recognized that a person’s sex might be ambiguous and “does not require that people who, having undergone a sex affirmation procedure, remain of indeterminate sex — that is, neither male nor female — must be registered, inaccurately, as one or the other. The Act itself recognises that a person may be other than male or female and therefore may be taken to permit the registration sought, as ‘nonspecific.’ ”

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/op...f=opinion&_r=0
Thanks for this!
OutofTune, smmath

advertisement
  #2  
Old Jun 02, 2014, 05:58 PM
bluekoi's Avatar
bluekoi bluekoi is offline
Administrator
Community Support Team
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 13,801
Bill3, Thanks for sharing this link.
Reply
Views: 450

attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.




 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.