![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I admit that I've been feeling pretty bad lately, a lot worse than usual. I've returned to SI, and I told my therapist (thinking it would be safe, of course)...she informed me that if I continued to hurt myself and was still doing so by our next session, we would have to tell my parents.
So I'm confused..can anyone answer my question? Since I am 18 years old, aren't I entitled to confidentiality? It doesn't make sense why she would "need" to tell them...is it because I still live at home? If I were in college and living on my own while seeing a therapist, would it make a difference? This seems unfair to me. I get why she would need to do this if I were much younger, but I'm not. And she's never threatened me like this when I've SIed before...why now?
__________________
Only you can prevent neurotypical jerkiness!
|
![]() KathyM
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Therapists can contact a family member is they feel your safety is in question, even if you are not a minor.
|
![]() Indie'sOK
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Are you suicidal? If not, your therapist might have gotten SI confused with that. If so, you need to correct this.
Unfortunately, I am not familiar with Michigan's medical consent laws. Perhaps you can look into it online. Ontario's legal age of medical consent is 16. A therapist has no right to contact family without a client's (usu. written) permission, unless it is a life threatening emergency. |
![]() Indie'sOK
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Only you can prevent neurotypical jerkiness!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
http://billmcdonaldonline.com/confidentiality.html
I found the above link with information from a therapist practicing in Michigan: " We keep a written record of treatment and conditions, this r ecord itself considered confidential in accord with the laws of the State of Michigan regulating privileged communication, except when: - legal constraints apply - when a compelling need arises based on substantial probability of personal harm to the client(s) or others, or in cases of a life-threatening emergency, - when an insurance carrier asks to review the records to verify the services billed to it have been rendered, and/or - when the client has signed an appropriate form for the release of information" Looks like the key part pertaining to you is what I bolded. If your T is calling your SI "."substantial probability of personal harm to the client(s)", then she looks to be within the law. Sounds like you need to have this discussion with your T though. |
![]() Indie'sOK
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Only you can prevent neurotypical jerkiness!
|
![]() KathyM
|
Reply |
|