![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Hey guys, i am doing my research paper on humanitarian interventions- its a persuasive paper, so i need a question to base my paper around. i know that there are disputes about it, but i don't know where to start really to develop a question out of that... so what question do you guys think that i could use to base an argument off of? Thanks!!!
__________________
"Wounds heal and become scars. But scars grow with us" -Stanislaw Lec |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I think NATO intervention in Kosova is a good example, as it was defined in these term. But at the same time it is controversial as the UN did not give approval for it.
You could look at the situation now and try to write if it a good move or not. You could say either it was a good move as it helped to oust Milosevic and stopped the immediate conflict...or it was bad because it caused cracks in the NATO-Russia relationship, set precendent for future unapproved invasions (Iraq).
__________________
Glory to heroes!
HATEFREE CULTURE |
![]() TheByzantine
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
U.S. foreign policy now as contrasted with what it was in the time of John Quincy Adams has a bearing on the efficacy of humanitarian interventions. John Quincy Adams also was a major player in the formulation of what became known as the Monroe doctrine. http://millercenter.org/president/events/12_02 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
If you are talking about interventions across national boundaries, the situation is really changing in the direction of more such interventions -- much more so than was the case only a few years, or especially decades, ago. Some countries, of course, such as China and Russia (and the US, if it comes in our direction) really react negatively to it. It seems to me an indication of their lack of self-confidence. The world really is becoming "smaller" in this way, and we cannot as easily avoid "meddling" in each others' affairs.
__________________
Now if thou would'st When all have given him o'er From death to life Thou might'st him yet recover -- Michael Drayton 1562 - 1631 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
so what do you guys think my question i aim to answer be:
is humanitarian intervention justifiable? is humanitarian intervention always right? is humanitarian intervention selfish? or something else? suggestions? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Can a well meant intervention make the situation worse than better?
(also, I suggest to research "just war").
__________________
Glory to heroes!
HATEFREE CULTURE |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I would go with the question: "is humanitarian intervention always right"? And I would touch upon U.S. intervention in Kosovo; whereby the U.S. did intervene and stop the genocide of the Muslim population, plus I might look at the Sudan, and use that to highlight why non-intervention in so many ways is wrong.
Interesting essay lxegirl; you've got lots of themes to play around with there! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
"humanitarian" invasions of other countries in the name of "right" rather than doing humanitarian good for our own peoples.
__________________
Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish, in lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. The world you desired can be won. It exists, it is real, it is possible, it is yours..~Ayn Rand |
![]() TheByzantine
|
Reply |
|