Thread Tools Display Modes
Grand Member
Member Since Aug 2013
Posts: 812
4 hugs
PC PoohBah!
Default Today at 06:59 PM
Thanks for the advise to go brand name. Did so, it's on its way. Did I get those i-t-s es right?

Which brings me to, read it out loud with another person! Going through some papers I saw the original graph which turned my head around about proofing. It said 2 people proofing in series (first I proof alone, then you proof alone) are not even close to as good as 2 people taking turns reading out loud while the other follows the text. This has been enshrined in extreme or agile programming where pairs of programmers work together.

I think the factor difference was 1000, meaning, dual proofing is 1000 times more accurate than serial proofing.

A sort of meta-meta-analysis on paired programming. It's meta squared because they cite meta-analysis studies along with a bunch of garden variety studies.


Revu2 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.


Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.