FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Member
Member Since Mar 2013
Location: somewhere not so sunny
Posts: 30
11 1 hugs
given |
#1
Simple question really which I felt has been answered but I thought I'll start a new thread anyway....
I'm 29 and I have been masturbating on average every day since I was 13/14. Do you think this is too much? Is there a problem in daily masturbation? The accepted, universal view is that masturbation of any frequency is ok and does not have any physical consequences. I want to hold back and cut down on the frequency but this is not easy as it's been a habit for so many years now. |
Reply With Quote |
Harley47, luvinglife2012
|
luvinglife2012
|
Crowned "The Good Witch"
Member Since Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,536
(SuperPoster!)
15 1,318 hugs
given |
#2
There's no such thing as too much masturbation as long as it doesn't interfere with your daily life.
|
Reply With Quote |
luvinglife2012
|
emgreen, luvinglife2012, newtus
|
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#3
Quote:
Riddle me this batman,why is it the eastern cultures claim "sex is the gates of life" and not "masturbation is the gates of life"?? I wish someone would make a poll here and we could see a show of hands on how many people think there are NO physical consequences to heavy/frequent masturbation lol.Keep dumping huge amounts of nutrients and free amino acids directly from your cerbral spinal fluid.Orgasm away huge amounts of HGH,keep causing the release of inflammatory hormones wholesale. I'm sure we can come up with a huge list of things healthwise that we used to believe which are no longer true,wouldnt that be fun.They dont even know why weed causes testicle cancer other then something like "well it must have something to do with testosterone since weed affects T levels..... |
|
Reply With Quote |
Crowned "The Good Witch"
Member Since Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,536
(SuperPoster!)
15 1,318 hugs
given |
#4
He doesn't need to be scared of masturbating, especially if you have nothing to back up your claims. And he is not asking whether or not it's healthy for him, he's asking how to cut back on masturbating.
And since I didn't answer that, my opinion is that there is no need to cut back even if you're not sexually active. |
Reply With Quote |
luvinglife2012
|
emgreen, luvinglife2012
|
Member
Member Since Mar 2013
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 96
11 472 hugs
given |
#5
Quote:
If there are no negative reasons for cutting back on the frequency why do it? If you are masturbating instead of having relationships with another then that is a problem, but if you masturbate because you currently don't have a lover then no harm done. __________________ Thank you! T. "Oh I love hugging! I wish I was an octopus so I can hug 8 people at a time." -author unknown |
|
Reply With Quote |
emgreen, hamster-bamster
|
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#6
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#7
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Crowned "The Good Witch"
Member Since Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,536
(SuperPoster!)
15 1,318 hugs
given |
#8
You should see what women ejaculate from their bodies once a month. And yet here we are, going to work, school, living out perfectly capable lives despite the blood loss and the eggs and the cramping, etc. I think a little fluid loss now and then won't kill ya, Dr. Phil.
|
Reply With Quote |
bixkf, Harley47, luvinglife2012
|
bixkf, emgreen, hamster-bamster, Harley47, luvinglife2012, newtus
|
Account Suspended
Member Since Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
(SuperPoster!)
13 3,729 hugs
given |
#9
Quote:
ultrarapidcycling - should men also cut down on partner sex in an effort to save precious vitality? |
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#10
Quote:
Women have my sympathys BUT your born with all your eggs so its not like losing an egg a month is draining nutrition,the blood loss yes but not the egg right? I looked online quickly and theres two sides.One side believes there no physical or mental consequence to masturbation.One site even had some dctr answering emails and 1 said i mstrbate 16x in 1 day is it harmfull?Every answer was basically "its normal and harmless".I wont go into the other side since everyone here is entrenched in the completely harmless camp.To answer the original ? which was(i think) is mstrbating 1x a day have physical consequences?No matter what you believe it really comes down to the person right?For some it may not have consequences and others it might not.If the original poster doesnt believe theres any physical consequences why ask if mstrbating 1x a day is too much?confused.... |
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#11
Sure i'm being prodded with a stick now huh?lol.I think you have the wrong vibe from me to ask that ? Look ive taken a road never travelled(through no intention of my own).Its led me to some pretty crazy not well known info MEDICALLY.If you people think you know it all you are sorely mistaken.Please feel free to enlighten me on your knowledge of the most severe expression of pelvic myoneuropathy/uccps in men and how you would go about fixing that lol?Not many DOCTORS even know what that would be no less how to fix it.The stage is all yours,Dr Phil...
|
Reply With Quote |
Account Suspended
Member Since Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
(SuperPoster!)
13 3,729 hugs
given |
#12
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#13
|
Reply With Quote |
Account Suspended
Member Since Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
(SuperPoster!)
13 3,729 hugs
given |
#14
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#15
I meant the original post.Limit themselves as far as what sex or masturbation or both?Ive noticed the general consensus on this forum which is any amount of masturbation seems harmless.I disagree and maybe we should start its own thread.Theres alot of variables that play into this situ for different people and its not a 1 answer across the board in my mind.Some of what i believe is definitely NOT considered fact/correct medically but medicine changes all the time.
|
Reply With Quote |
Crowned "The Good Witch"
Member Since Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,536
(SuperPoster!)
15 1,318 hugs
given |
#16
Quote:
If you want to scare him into thinking he's got some rare disorder simply because he masturbates, that's pretty cruel thinking even with the best intentions. This topic again has absolutely nothing to do with the amount he masturbates. If you want to start your own thread go ahead, but leave this thread for the people who can answer the question on topic. |
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#17
Quote:
Your statement about UCCPS is WRONG.I'll leave you to your belief tho. For everyone who believes theres no physical consequences to overmasturbation for men,theres probably an equal # who attribute a huge amount of serious symptoms to it.Commonly referred to as sexual exhaustion,yeah maybe its not a verified condition,and maybe the definition of it is wrong in some places depending on whose defintion your reading.The symptoms are real tho. Had the original poster asked HOW to reduce masturbating i could have answered with some advice.He just said he was worried about cutting back because its been such a long time habit.Seemed like he wanted confirmation no amount of masturbating is too much,thats the long held facts... Yeah i'll leave the thread alone.Maybe i'll go post on my beliefs and success on going from raging bipolar 1 ultra rapid cycling to complete remission with no pharmaceutical meds?Nah i'll leave people to their doctors and pharmaceutical meds that work so super fantastically lol |
|
Reply With Quote |
Account Suspended
Member Since Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
(SuperPoster!)
13 3,729 hugs
given |
#18
Quote:
"referred" - might very well be, but "commonly" - no And even if something is "commonly referred", it still does not automatically make it true. |
|
Reply With Quote |
Grand Poohbah
Member Since Feb 2012
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 1,957
12 411 hugs
given |
#19
rofl Doc, your post last page was bar none the funniest thing I've read on my time here. Thanks for that.
To answer the OP's question, please don't worry about it. Once per day is pretty normal, IMHO. Masturbation is, in my opinion, only unhealthy when done to the point that it disrupts daily function or in the event you do something that is harmful to yourself in your practices, which is extremely unlikely. If you do wish to cut back (which I'm curious...why, if you don't mind me asking?), it's a matter of will, honestly. Disrupting the environment in which you masturbate helps (such as moving the computer, if that's a factor, away or out of your bedroom, making any sort of accessories harder to access, etc). But as far as beating the "urge" itself goes...I would imagine it's a "simple" matter of consciously abstaining, which is difficult, to say the least. As far as the growing debate here goes, men produce more sperm than can ever possibly be used, even if the 5x per day challenge were to be accepted for years on end. I'm not going to say that there isn't a significant protein content in ejaculatory fluid, but they've pretty generally served their purpose once they're let loose into the world. Ejaculation isn't some sort of hemmorhage of nutritional content. If one thinks of our ancient ancestors, losing nutrients at such a rate would be counterproductive to the continuation of the species. Furthermore, and respectfully...where anatomically do I lose spinal fluid out that particular portion of my body? __________________ The world suffers alot. Not because of the violence of bad people, but because of the silence of good people.- Napoleon Bonaparte |
Reply With Quote |
hamster-bamster, LiteraryLark
|
Member
Member Since Jan 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 26
12 |
#20
Quote:
yeah whats funnier the way both of you reinforce your own misquotes or the referring of uccps as a rare or exotic disease.And since all current knowledge of everything is complete and correct and with references(of course),yet to the ? of whats the most severe expression of ucpps in men which doesnt even have a definitive or official name,of course was not answered(to make my point not all knowledge is complete).At the very least keep on with the current thinking that NO AMOUNT of masturbation has any consequences.Especially males guided under that assumption from childhood,what proportion will continue on to excessive internet porn?God knows theres no internet presence of males which an endless list of health problems they attribute to excessive masturbation.A funny phenomenon with the internet how people reinforce their own beliefs.Carry on... |
|
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|