Quote:
Originally Posted by lynn P.
I tend to agree with RomanSunburn - I hear a lot of criticism for your wife and I wonder whats her take on this relationship? Firstly before a couple makes a commitment, they should consider whether they are matched sexually, so that's the 1st downfall. You boast about a high sex drive and claim she's frigid - when couples argue about sex, this squashes desire. I agree the affair and your opinion of her, wouldn't be a turn on. She may also think since you can't have intercourse, you therefore don't want sex. I wonder if she misses intercourse? You're also proud of your desire to perform oral sex on a "well endowed man". I'm not against gay or bisexuals at all but I certainly wouldn't want to be in a relationship when my partner desires other men or women.
Are you staying with your wife just because you don't want to break up the financial assets? Thinking about other women / men doesn't make for a growing marriage. If you were out in the single world - how would a realistic sex life look to you...minus the boasting? Do you think you could satisfy a partner 'long term' given your physical limitations? What qualities make you in the Lamborghini class besides a high sex drive.
|
Lynn, In 1963 we were fully matched or at least satisfactorily. That continued when we were married in 1966. After our first child in 1969, things began to change. I am not saying she has never wanted sex with me, historically. I am saying that she never, ever wanted it nearly as much as me. You may be right about her current responses in view of ED--i.e. she may think I don't want sex anymore--, but her relatively low libido--compared to mine-- existed a lot time ago, and long before my EM affair. You mis-categorized my bisexual urges as marked by "pride." I never said I was proud of that. The Lamborghini terminology refers to my powerful libido, as in the L's powerful engine and I obviously referred to "no gas" as having ED, and "no track" as the absence of a suitable partner.