Online OSDD test?

I've seen online DID tests, but are there any tests for OSDD? Someone made the following post on the differences. Is it true?

Quote,

Also there's DDNOS.

https://information.pods-online.org....oes-it-matter/

https://forums.psychcentral.com/diss...s-dsm-5-a.html

I think maybe this thread will be helpful for you to read.

Does DSM 5 include OSDD?

Yes.And here's another helpful thread.

https://forums.psychcentral.com/diss...tive-stup.html

Does it bother anyone that mainstream psychologist always have an exception for broadly accepted cultural or religious practices? Ug that really bothers me, as if you're really messed up ... unless you're part of a big religion. Give me a break. OMG............ That places an even larger wedge between academic scientists and psychologist, even though psychology is supposed to be part of the sciences.

I'm guessing there's a more detailed DSM 5 section on DID because I didn't see any mention of OSDD there.

Don't mean to start a rant, but I just have to say something else on this... "Sure, if you believe there's an angry, wrathful, jealous, vengeful God sitting on a throne who speaks to some people, who created the Universe and a lake of fire so bad people can be tortured forever, but won't give anyone a shred of rational evidence, then yup, you're fine and dandy, but otherwise you're a nutjob."

Okay I feel better now.

Because, if they don't include that "exception," then suddenly a few billion people on Earth have a mental disorder and hundreds of millions of people who hear "God" and other religious figures have a serious mental disorder. ... That's annoying.

Post #5 in this thread is about OSDD.And the other link is about it too.

Where does it provide the distinctions between OSDD-1a and OSDD-1b?

If you read post #12 in this second link I posted you will see there's no numbers in the diagnosis in the US

https://forums.psychcentral.com/diss...tive-stup.html

That's fine, and thanks for the info. I'm no longer interested in the online test. For the most part I'm just discouraged about the present state of psychology. I mean, therapists who are there to help you emotionally or whatever is great, but all of the stuff about giving people titles to what disorder they have I personally would stay clear from. I have serious issues with DSM 5 when it basically says you're fine and dandy if you hear "God" or "Jesus" or an "Angel of God" or "Buddha" or "Allah" speak to you, but if it's an "ET," then you could very well have serious issues. And a lot of the medicines they subscribe scare me. Some medicines appear to be helpful to a lot of people, although definitely not everyone, but there are some medicines that have side effects I wouldn't take for anything.

Have you tried The Sanity Score?

https://sanity.psychcentral.com/

Years ago, but I know from experience that it's no longer valid and has changed a lot for the better. I might take it again if it's not too long. It'll be interesting to see how it's changed.

I just took it. It's a lot better and completely different than last time. There's only one serious concern now, Self-Esteem, but who cares about that. I don't. A few years ago this same test said I had 11 serious concerns. To be honest, given the relatively few number of questions it asked, I think this test is not very accurate because it covers so many areas. A person would have to spend a lot of time with me to get a good grasp what's happening, and then they might want to put me in a psych ward.

Sanity Score: 92

General Coping 43
Life Events 44
Depression 44
Anxiety 58
Phobias 42
Self-Esteem 92
Eating Disorders 30
Schizophrenia 40
Dissociation 0
Mania 35
Sexual Issues 0
Relationship Issues 0
Alcohol 17
Drugs 0
Physical Issues 0
Smoking Issues 0
Gambling Issues 0
Technology Issues 31
Obsessions/Compulsions 38
Posttraumatic Stress 8
Borderline Traits 42

But then again I'm 100% certain they don't or wouldn't understand some people such as myself. So such a diagnosis would be meaningless.