Home Menu

Menu


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old Feb 10, 2018, 03:01 AM
Anonymous59090
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elio View Post
Mouse, can I PM you about this topic?
Sorry, just seen this. You can.

advertisement
  #27  
Old Feb 10, 2018, 03:13 PM
JacksonLiam JacksonLiam is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: Maine
Posts: 29
My T told me how he felt numerous times but then when I called him to play his hand he played the transference card.
  #28  
Old Feb 11, 2018, 06:11 PM
Anonymous45141
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonLiam View Post
My T told me how he felt numerous times but then when I called him to play his hand he played the transference card.
What do you mean?
  #29  
Old Feb 12, 2018, 05:23 AM
cold_nomad cold_nomad is offline
Junior Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: Kosovo
Posts: 19
Transference can never be fully resolved, especially whet it has to do with deep attachment. This attachment comes when the therapist is a good fit, and it represents the person who you see as your ideal self, and the one that you have been missing all your life. It becomes harder when you feel that the therapist cares about you (genuinely or not), and you can not be with her. So yes, when genuine feelings are involved, it becomes much, much harder.

Thus comes the idealization, admiration, love and pain. It breaks you even more, it can be traumatic, leading to suicidal thoughts. You forget the initial reason why you started therapy in the first place, it becomes your main issue. You feel nothing, but sadness. You get trapped in this spiral of suffering and it becomes impossible to get out.
This is the sad truth. I am talking from my own unfortunate experience .

Last edited by cold_nomad; Feb 12, 2018 at 07:31 AM.
Hugs from:
Anonymous87914, rainbow8
Thanks for this!
here today
  #30  
Old Feb 12, 2018, 07:23 AM
Anonymous55498
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by cold_nomad View Post
Transference can never be fully resolved, especially whet it has to do with deep attachment. This attachment comes when the therapist is a good fit, and it represents the person who you see as your ideal self, and the one that you have been missing all your life. It becomes harder when you feel that the therapist cares about you (genuinely or not), and you can not be with her. So yes, when genuine feelings are involved, it becomes much, much harder.

Thus comes the idealization, admiration, love and pain. It breaks you even more, it can be traumatic, leading to suicidal thoughts. You forget the initial reason why you started therapy in the first place, it becomes you main issue. You feel nothing, but sadness. You get trapped in this spiral of suffering and it becomes impossible to get out.
This is the sad truth. I am talking from my own unfortunate experience .
What I bolded is exactly what was driving my pretty long transference pattern in my youth. Not so much in therapy in my early 40s as I never saw the Ts as a more ideal version of me, but there were many people earlier and usually the focus was on specific features with each. For me, the fantasy/idealization wasn't painful but rather inspirational, I used it to try to realize those things in myself, so I only "needed" each person transiently as it was really mostly about myself and my potential and development. And this latter is exactly why, I think, it would be so important in therapy to focus on improving the client's everyday life and outside of therapy satisfaction, rather than focusing on the attachment to the T (a projected, fantasy self-image) but without doing anything to make it real in ourselves. At least for those that experience this type of transference pattern. One can analyze the relationship and attachment to death even with the most competent T, but it will remain frustrating and painful as the gap between who we want to become and who we currently are never gets any narrower, let alone disappear - so the transference is never resolved in a deep, individual sense.

I really think that conventional theories often dismiss the above element of personal development and can distort the meaning of transference, assigning it to old lacks in appropriate parental care and longing for that in therapy. Even if that is true for a person, I think the interpretation is often not deep enough. Why do we need a good parent after all? An important factor is that they can inspire us and help us to strive as individuals and to develop our potentials later in life, as independent, self actualizing people. But if it gets stuck in the relationship and attachment, then such individuation cannot occur, we may continue longing for what feels missing and not realize it is our own, autonomous, accomplished adult self.

Last edited by Anonymous55498; Feb 12, 2018 at 07:46 AM.
Thanks for this!
cold_nomad, here today
  #31  
Old Feb 12, 2018, 08:22 AM
here today here today is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 3,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xynesthesia View Post
What I bolded is exactly what was driving my pretty long transference pattern in my youth. Not so much in therapy in my early 40s as I never saw the Ts as a more ideal version of me, but there were many people earlier and usually the focus was on specific features with each. For me, the fantasy/idealization wasn't painful but rather inspirational, I used it to try to realize those things in myself, so I only "needed" each person transiently as it was really mostly about myself and my potential and development. And this latter is exactly why, I think, it would be so important in therapy to focus on improving the client's everyday life and outside of therapy satisfaction, rather than focusing on the attachment to the T (a projected, fantasy self-image) but without doing anything to make it real in ourselves. At least for those that experience this type of transference pattern. One can analyze the relationship and attachment to death even with the most competent T, but it will remain frustrating and painful as the gap between who we want to become and who we currently are never gets any narrower, let alone disappear - so the transference is never resolved in a deep, individual sense.

I really think that conventional theories often dismiss the above element of personal development and can distort the meaning of transference, assigning it to old lacks in appropriate parental care and longing for that in therapy. Even if that is true for a person, I think the interpretation is often not deep enough. Why do we need a good parent after all? An important factor is that they can inspire us and help us to strive as individuals and to develop our potentials later in life, as independent, self actualizing people. But if it gets stuck in the relationship and attachment, then such individuation cannot occur, we may continue longing for what feels missing and not realize it is our own, autonomous, accomplished adult self.
I agree with much of this post and have highlighted what I think are very important points.

In my case, I believe that my idealizations of parents and others in my early environment were "truamatically" interrupted. But then I dissociated that rage and disappointment and "pretended". I also had some good feelings for my family,so another way to look at it was the good and bad just got "split" and I didn't feel the bad.

So, it makes sense that after 6 years with a T who mimicked some of those old patterns I got into a negative transferecence that was very powerful and overcame any other feelings I had for that T. And she couldn't tolerate being the all-bad. It was possible for me to get out of that feeling and into an intellectual, problem-solving relationship with her, which I wanted to do, but she was not able to do that.

For me, using intellectual skills in partnership with her would have been an example and a working out of another type of "transference", the "alter ego" transference. I look on that, and the longing for that, as a step AFTER "successful" idealization (valuing the idealization but also realizing idealized people are not the same as the idealizations, or perfect). I'm not sure that Kohut saw it like that, but the feeling I have, and the longing for that which I can experience, gives me clues that's how it might have worked for me.

The "alter ego" transference toward adults or older children in one's environment would lead naturally into "alter ego" feelings and relationships with peers in adolescence.

My view is that my idealizations in childhood got disappointed and interrupted prematurely and I never got through the "alter ego" stage and I then "failed" adolescence. (Partially another story there, though)

However, idealistically, theoretically, (I'm still kind of stuck, there, folks!) I feel like those stages could be worked through, if I had (therapist?) people in my environment who kind of understood that, and my own "autonomous, accomplished adult self" could be found and developed. Even at 70 I feel that way, even though a lot of it didn't happen (yet). Still. . .
Reply
Views: 4187

attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.




 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.