![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I don't believe you have a case against this t.
You are responsible for your choices and she gave you the option of the waiting room or home. If you had chose the waiting room and decided to leave anyway what could she have done about it? Therapist do not have the power that she could have kept you in her office. If you had insisted on leaving she would have to let you go anyway. The fact that you had shown up to the session (you could have attempted suicide beforehand) and had agreed to a hospital admission shows you had some insight and were taking steps to keep yourself safe...but made an impulsive decision and won't take responsibility for it. If she had let you leave without a plan and without checking in then this would be a different case. I feel quite sorry for her being put through this.We give our therapists so much power we forget we have our own and they are not responsible for us or our actions outside of the sessions...thats our job. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
What I know from my own experience is that when the board investigator interviewed me after I filed a complaint, he had me sign the release form for my therapist so the board would be able to request my records from him.
I have no idea if the therapist has a choice to dig in their heels when the board requests the records and I don't know if they have a choice to submit the summary instead of the full record. In my state, the therapist can choose to give the summary instead of the copies of the records when the patient requests to see the records or they can let the patient examine their file in their office. I have no idea if they have the same choice when dealing with the board. I guess, they may have the right to refuse to present the full record under the pretense that it'd be detrimental for the patient's well-being, but the board would see it as a refusal to cooperate, which would not work in the therapist's favor. I'd think that the board would be interested in seeing the full records because they want to investigate what factually took place and for that they need as much information as possible. The board doesn't put everything that pertains to the case, including the patient's records, for public access after the case is closed and the judgment is issued. In fact, they put as little as possible in there just to illustrate the point that the therapist violated ethics in some way. In my case they selected just a few facts from the whole case and from the records to illustrate that point and to make it easy to understand what exactly went wrong. Those were the least personal and sensitive details. It didn't feel violating to me in any sense, especially since my identity was concealed. So, no, in my experience, the board doesn't make the public record look embarrassing for the patient. They compose it wisely and sensitively. But that was my experience. Other people may experience it differently. What I was trying to say that regardless of what is put out there for public access, people who investigate and evaluate the case would, probably, know a lot of private and sensitive details because that's what the investigation process requires. How else would you be able to accurately assess what went on if you don't dig out as many details as possible? Nothing in that process felt ****ed up to me. They were just doing their job. I read the public record of my case. There was nothing in there that reflected negatively on me and everything that reflected negatively on my therapist. I've read other people's cases when they went public and haven't seen any case that would look embarrassing for the person who filed a complaint. So, no, there is nothing ****ed up about this process and I hope the simple fact that the investigators would come across many personal details of your case because they need to do their job won't deter anyone from reporting unethical therapists. Quote:
|
![]() AllHeart, precaryous, SalingerEsme, susannahsays
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
![]() Ididitmyway, Out There, SalingerEsme
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"I carried a watermelon?" President of the no F's given society. |
![]() Ididitmyway, LonesomeTonight, Out There, SalingerEsme
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This is ridiculous. And rude. And judgey. And many other words that the forums will bleep out if I try to post them. |
![]() ChickenNoodleSoup, LonesomeTonight, Out There
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Living things don’t all require/ light in the same degree. Louise Gluck |
![]() LonesomeTonight
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() LonesomeTonight
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
I'll Google it again this evening and post the link. I don't recall off hand
__________________
Grief is the price you pay for love. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
I read the same thing on my state's licensing board's website. I was searching for as much information as I could find and came across the page that described the process of how the board assesses which complaints are worthy of investigating. I don't know if I can find that link right now. In there it was said that about 2/3 of complaints don't get investigated because they lack evidence and for other reasons. After I filed my complaint I received the response from the board explaining that it'd take them some time to review it to decide if it warrants investigation. So, no, they definitely don't investigate every complaint. I can believe that most of them get dismissed as not credible. Many people have no idea how to write official documents in order to be taken seriously, so..
Last edited by Ididitmyway; Jan 02, 2019 at 10:23 PM. |
![]() AllHeart, LonesomeTonight
|
Reply |
|