Home Menu

Menu


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old Sep 09, 2019, 07:48 AM
Anonymous48807
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomatenoir View Post
While I'm very happy you can afford mental health care on a tight budget, it's unrealistic to say anyone can simply sacrifice more and go private. There are people out there who have less income or no income (unemployed, job seekers, carers) and more outgoings (dependent children, high-cost of living areas) who can't just make it work if they try harder.

Is private healthcare better? In my experience, yes, but that's true of virtually everything, from education to roads to live-in childcare. And I suspect private mental healthcare remains relatively affordable in the UK precisely because private therapists know clients have the option of going to the NHS and paying nothing.

I'm not a huge fan of the NHS. I've had exceptional care, but I've also had care that was incredibly poor.

Some of the issues I had with the NHS are down to a**holes who shouldn't be working in healthcare to begin with. But a lot of the issues were down to understaffing and a lack of funds.

Countries that don't have public healthcare have their own issues. I grew up in Canada (which had universal healthcare), and went to university in a town that bordered the US. I worked in a supermarket with a pharmacy. The number of Americans hopping the border to buy insulin because they couldn't afford it at home was shocking. Some told me they rationed it.

I'd rather live in a country that provides both public and private services.
I agree with you.
I'm just pointing out that going private isn't all about being priveledged and the NHS isn't above being critised.

advertisement
  #27  
Old Sep 10, 2019, 08:48 AM
TeaVicar?'s Avatar
TeaVicar? TeaVicar? is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: in the parlour.
Posts: 353
You're right, NHS provisions for MH are depressing and seem to be getting worse. low fee therapy is around though, try the training organisations in London, they often have low fee clinics. It's also worth considering searching for a private therapist as many offer a sliding scale for fees and some might have some very low cost fee places.

The Guild of Psychotherapists | Reduced-fee Clinic - Reg Charity No. 1093686

The SITE for Contemporary Psychoanalysis ~ Clinic

low fee intensive therapy | British Psychotherapy Foundation
__________________
"It is a joy to be hidden but a disaster not to be found." D.W. Winnicott
  #28  
Old Sep 10, 2019, 10:14 PM
susannahsays's Avatar
susannahsays susannahsays is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Member Since: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echos Myron redux View Post
I just want to say for the record that the NHS is amazing and I feel eternally grateful to live in a country offering free universal healthcare.
Nothing is free. I expect that's the problem regardless of the system and that system's unique shortcomings.

Well, that and the way the rich just get richer and horde all their wealth.

I don't see a solution. If you have "free" public healthcare, you have politicians, **** mental health services, and decreased autonomy. If you have a private system, profits come before all else, it is also highly politicized (at least here), and the costs can get pretty ridiculous (especially when you force them to cover everybody).

Nope. I just don't see a solution, unless the miserly rich ****s decide to stop being so damn selfish and hording more money to themselves than they can even spend.
__________________
Life is hard. Then you die. Then they throw dirt in your face.
-David Gerrold
  #29  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 03:04 AM
sophiebunny sophiebunny is offline
Veteran Member
 
Member Since: Jan 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by susannahsays View Post
Nothing is free. I expect that's the problem regardless of the system and that system's unique shortcomings.

Well, that and the way the rich just get richer and horde all their wealth.

I don't see a solution. If you have "free" public healthcare, you have politicians, **** mental health services, and decreased autonomy. If you have a private system, profits come before all else, it is also highly politicized (at least here), and the costs can get pretty ridiculous (especially when you force them to cover everybody).

Nope. I just don't see a solution, unless the miserly rich ****s decide to stop being so damn selfish and hording more money to themselves than they can even spend.
You aren't entitled to someone else's money.
  #30  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 04:45 AM
Echos Myron redux Echos Myron redux is offline
Magnate
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 2,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheltiemom2007 View Post
You aren't entitled to someone else's money.
When taxation works properly, it isn't someone else's money, it is public money. Wealthy people benefit enormously from the structure and makeup of society. It is only fair that they contribute to it in a meaningful way, if they are going to reap the benefits.
  #31  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 05:19 AM
Anonymous48807
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echos Myron redux View Post
When taxation works properly, it isn't someone else's money, it is public money. Wealthy people benefit enormously from the structure and makeup of society. It is only fair that they contribute to it in a meaningful way, if they are going to reap the benefits.
What about those that don't contribute. Should they reap the benefits too?

My son worked hard to get where he is. Yes, worked to get where he is. Unyet they fleece him through the tax system.

To much of this take, take take. Give me give me give me.
What about go make it happen yourself
  #32  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 07:51 AM
susannahsays's Avatar
susannahsays susannahsays is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Member Since: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheltiemom2007 View Post
You aren't entitled to someone else's money.
You really ought to educate yourself on income inequality before you accuse me of saying I think I am entitled to someone else's money. That is a really inflammatory, not to mention inaccurate, thing to say.

I am suggesting the wealthiest people pay their fair share in taxes, which isn't happening. I don't see how that means I think I am entitled to someone else's money.
__________________
Life is hard. Then you die. Then they throw dirt in your face.
-David Gerrold
Hugs from:
Echos Myron redux
Thanks for this!
RosyC
  #33  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 11:45 AM
tomatenoir's Avatar
tomatenoir tomatenoir is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by The mouse View Post
What about those that don't contribute. Should they reap the benefits too?

My son worked hard to get where he is. Yes, worked to get where he is. Unyet they fleece him through the tax system.

To much of this take, take take. Give me give me give me.
What about go make it happen yourself
Did your son have the benefit of a public education? Did you receive child benefit while he was growing up? Did you do extra mileage on roads to complete school runs? Because, if he/you did, I and countless other childless people helped to pay for that. So yes, I expect a certain amount of his income to go back into the pot -- I want my investment back into the social services that I, as a childless person, will be more likely use (like end-of-life care and the NHS, as it's unlikely I'll have family to take care of me).

You have to be making nearly double the median national salary in the UK before taxes really start digging into your wages, and even then, those taxes are paying for services you're using. 'Fleecing' is a bit of an exaggeration.

I'm an immigrant to the UK. The Home Office charged me an NHS fee on top of the taxes I already pay. My final visa was £3000, despite the fact their costs are about £300. That's fleecing.
Hugs from:
Echos Myron redux
Thanks for this!
RosyC, susannahsays
  #34  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 12:26 PM
Anonymous48807
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomatenoir View Post
Did your son have the benefit of a public education? Did you receive child benefit while he was growing up? Did you do extra mileage on roads to complete school runs? Because, if he/you did, I and countless other childless people helped to pay for that. So yes, I expect a certain amount of his income to go back into the pot -- I want my investment back into the social services that I, as a childless person, will be more likely use (like end-of-life care and the NHS, as it's unlikely I'll have family to take care of me).

You have to be making nearly double the median national salary in the UK before taxes really start digging into your wages, and even then, those taxes are paying for services you're using. 'Fleecing' is a bit of an exaggeration.

I'm an immigrant to the UK. The Home Office charged me an NHS fee on top of the taxes I already pay. My final visa was £3000, despite the fact their costs are about £300. That's fleecing.
That's not fleecing. That's fair.
  #35  
Old Sep 11, 2019, 04:48 PM
tomatenoir's Avatar
tomatenoir tomatenoir is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by The mouse View Post
That's not fleecing. That's fair.
It's discrimination and it's financial rape.

I'm not going to respond further, but I'm so glad my British husband and friends don't think like you.
Hugs from:
Echos Myron redux
  #36  
Old Sep 12, 2019, 12:02 AM
Anonymous48807
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomatenoir View Post
It's discrimination and it's financial rape.

I'm not going to respond further, but I'm so glad my British husband and friends don't think like you.

OK whrn everyone else's paying.

My point.
  #37  
Old Sep 13, 2019, 12:03 AM
sophiebunny sophiebunny is offline
Veteran Member
 
Member Since: Jan 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echos Myron redux View Post
When taxation works properly, it isn't someone else's money, it is public money. Wealthy people benefit enormously from the structure and makeup of society. It is only fair that they contribute to it in a meaningful way, if they are going to reap the benefits.
Taxation needs to be fair and utilized appropriately for things the government is actually responsible to do. If I work a 60 hour week the government is not entitled to 30 hours of my week. I am. I put in the effort and skill. Oppressive taxation is theft and also makes it much harder to give to charities. Government is lousy at managing social programs.
Reply
Views: 2305

attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.




 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.