Home Menu

Menu


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Sep 10, 2014, 08:40 PM
googliega googliega is offline
New Member
 
Member Since: Jul 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 2
I'm going to assume the paradigm of lee's love styles for this post. I'm not sure how valid the model is, and I did ask myself exactly how much thought was put into it when it was described.

It's tempting to see Eros and Ludus on a continuum, for example, where mania lies in between. So a mix of these components might lead to mania. The cure for mania is then to knock one of these components. I find it strange thinking about it that way.

It's interesting that there have been attempts to correlate love styles to attachment styles. It's clear that anxious / insecure is bad, and interestingly enough mania is positively correlated with this attachment style.

Should we all fall into one mold? That is, is there only one healthy love style, pragma, a combination of ludus and storge? Is eros completely bad, and should we knock it out completely to enforce this? I've always preferred the storge + eros mix and never cared to much for ludus.

advertisement
  #2  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 10:17 PM
Travelinglady's Avatar
Travelinglady Travelinglady is offline
Legendary Wise Elder
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 49,212
Hello, googliega, and welcome to Psych Central! Alas, I am not familiar with these love styles, but maybe someone will come along soon who is.
  #3  
Old Sep 15, 2014, 12:21 AM
curley's Avatar
curley curley is offline
Veteran Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by googliega View Post
I'm going to assume the paradigm of lee's love styles for this post. I'm not sure how valid the model is, and I did ask myself exactly how much thought was put into it when it was described.

It's tempting to see Eros and Ludus on a continuum, for example, where mania lies in between. So a mix of these components might lead to mania. The cure for mania is then to knock one of these components. I find it strange thinking about it that way.

It's interesting that there have been attempts to correlate love styles to attachment styles. It's clear that anxious / insecure is bad, and interestingly enough mania is positively correlated with this attachment style.

Should we all fall into one mold? That is, is there only one healthy love style, pragma, a combination of ludus and storge? Is eros completely bad, and should we knock it out completely to enforce this? I've always preferred the storge + eros mix and never cared to much for ludus.


You ask should we fall into a mold. I don't think anyone should fall into a mold. But it seems the studies of different people and how who they are in love shows that people fall into all the the primary or secondary category. But there can be mixtures of both. I think we have all known people that could be placed completely into one category! Some of the categories don't seem very desirable to me!!!
__________________


People are like stained glass windows They sparkle and shine in the sun but when
darkness hits their true beauty is
revealed only when there is light within . Elizabeth Krubel-Ros
Reply
Views: 376

attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.




 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.