![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think anyone says you are already having sex. People are just suggesting you use protection WHEN you have sex. People with multiple partners easily contract std and then some. Are you against safe sex? You seem to get upset when people suggest you use Condom. Why?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm only biased in the sense that somehow a flag went up for me earlier in your thread with a little worry, one survivor to another, of hoping he's not being exploitive even subtly towards you. I hope you can forgive me for mentioning such concern. And if this is an exciting new phase and direction in your life, chosen by you because of a need to spead your wings in a non traditional way, then I support that of you. ![]() "Investigate your hidden assumptions."-Cornel West |
![]() Yours_Truly
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() ImmerAllein
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes, we, as humans, tend to want to label, explain, describe, categorize, analyze, and understand everything. In doing so, we deaden everything in the world ... with our minds !!! Analysis has its place in our lives, but I think relationships are better served with the other part of the brain. It's not how you think about it, but how you feel about it, that matters. In other words, relationships, are beyond analysis. They are far too divine to be understood by the brain. Think about it ... the communion of two human beings is a sacred event. The feeling of oneness with that other being goes way beyond anything any of us could write on this forum or read in a Psychology book. Why put all kinds of labels and expectations and needs on the interaction ?! Keep it mysterious, fresh, and open to possibilities ! In the end, if you walk away from the interaction feeling good, that is probably a relationship you should continue with ... simple, right ? ![]() ![]()
__________________
I turn to the crowd as they're watching They're sitting all together in the dark in the warm I wanted to be in there among them I see how their eyes are gathered into one And then she turns to me with her hand extended Her palm is split with a flower with a flame - Suzanne Vega (1987) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Not criticizing, I just don't understand. The other thing is, deep without commitment, does this mean the assumption that it will get deep because whatever and then it stays deep magically without commitment ensuring it will, or it doesn't have to stay deep? Or maybe the answer is that some people work in a way emotionally that's different from the people who are not compatible with polyamory? I don't know... |
![]() Yours_Truly
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
This topic got me thinking more... really not criticism btw.
I do know a girl who lived in a sexually open relationship. It was a deep relationship with commitment. Not polyamory, just sexually open. I kinda understood how it can work for them because she explained how emotionally they consciously keep a meaningful commitment and exclusivity even while with someone else. This basically meant boundaries, some things were not to be done or to be felt with the sex partners. This worked well for them. This polyamory concept for a deep relationship really does go over my head however. I can imagine someone loving many people on a superficial level. I can see that as polyamory. But on a deep level too? That is what does not compute for me. So it either doesn't work at all or it does work for people who somehow work differently emotionally. Hmm... |
Reply |
|