Home Menu

Menu


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Jul 16, 2013, 05:53 AM
iamanders iamanders is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 46
PAX!
You can get an Asperger diagnosis (well, maybe not in the USA) or an Autism diagnosis but I've never even heard of a Neurotypical diagnosis.

An example (that will never happen):
John has been meeting with psychiatrists and psychologist for some time and now they will give their final statement/report about his diagnosis. So they tell him that they think he's a bit odd and will diagnose him with NT....
This will obviously never happen!

If there can be AS and Autism diagnoses why not also have an NT diagnosis?

advertisement
  #2  
Old Jul 16, 2013, 09:06 AM
rosska's Avatar
rosska rosska is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 272
I see what you're getting at, but of course it makes sense that people don't get diagnosed as NT.
NT means Neuro Typical and generally speaking you don't diagnose typical behaviour, because it's typical. Diagnosis comes for things that are not typical behaviour. Essentially diagnosing somebody as NT would be like diagnosing somebody as being healthy, it wouldn't make much sense.

Being that we are not the 'typical' mind set, we're the one's who get diagnosed as being so.

Think of it in another context, for example cars. If you take your car to the garage and they find that it is functioning the way it is supposed to, they wouldn't say "Well we've found the problem, it's working as intended". They would simply say "There's nothing wrong with it".
  #3  
Old Jul 17, 2013, 10:11 AM
iamanders iamanders is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosska View Post
Essentially diagnosing somebody as NT would be like diagnosing somebody as being healthy, it wouldn't make much sense.
NT is not a disorder, Neither is AS.
If you can't diagnose someone with NT due to the fact that they are healthy then you can't diagnose someone with AS.
I am still happy to have my diagnosis.
  #4  
Old Jul 17, 2013, 03:35 PM
Hellion's Avatar
Hellion Hellion is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamanders View Post
PAX!
You can get an Asperger diagnosis (well, maybe not in the USA) or an Autism diagnosis but I've never even heard of a Neurotypical diagnosis.

An example (that will never happen):
John has been meeting with psychiatrists and psychologist for some time and now they will give their final statement/report about his diagnosis. So they tell him that they think he's a bit odd and will diagnose him with NT....
This will obviously never happen!

If there can be AS and Autism diagnoses why not also have an NT diagnosis?
Because having typical neurology is hardly a condition that interferes with ones life...autism on the other hand sort of is. That would be like diagnosing people who don't have a mental illness as non-mentally ill which would be pointless.
Thanks for this!
rosska
  #5  
Old Jul 17, 2013, 05:11 PM
rosska's Avatar
rosska rosska is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamanders View Post
NT is not a disorder, Neither is AS.
If you can't diagnose someone with NT due to the fact that they are healthy then you can't diagnose someone with AS.
I am still happy to have my diagnosis.
I think you've missed my point. Also, I never said it was a disorder, however Aspergers is classed as a syndrome, hence the S in AS.
You can diagnose somebody with AS, because we have atypical neurology, which means it's not the typical neurology that the majority of the population have. You can't diagnose somebody for being the same as the majority of the Human population, that wouldn't make any sense at all.

Since my car analogy didn't work, how about something more Human? Take a transgender person for example, they are diagnosed as having a gender identity disorder because their own feeling of self identity is different to their outward appearance. Though there is no diagnosis for people who are not transgender because that's the typical presentation of our species.

And before you comment on GID being a 'disorder', many things that are diagnosable are not disorders, it doesn't make them any less diagnosable.
  #6  
Old Jul 20, 2013, 12:20 PM
iamanders iamanders is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 46
well, your answer is an interesting one...
but I don't think we should talk about gender identity disorder (I, personaly, see it as a disorder) when we talk about autism spectrum conditions/disorders.
  #7  
Old Jul 20, 2013, 02:00 PM
rosska's Avatar
rosska rosska is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamanders View Post
well, your answer is an interesting one...
but I don't think we should talk about gender identity disorder (I, personaly, see it as a disorder) when we talk about autism spectrum conditions/disorders.
I was using it to make a point. People don't get 'diagnosed' for being the typical average presentation of a Human being. They get diagnosed for not being the typical average presentation of a Human being.
  #8  
Old Jul 24, 2013, 01:22 PM
Douglas MacNeill's Avatar
Douglas MacNeill Douglas MacNeill is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamanders View Post
PAX!
You can get an Asperger diagnosis (well, maybe not in the USA) or an Autism diagnosis but I've never even heard of a Neurotypical diagnosis.

An example (that will never happen):
John has been meeting with psychiatrists and psychologist for some time and now they will give their final statement/report about his diagnosis. So they tell him that they think he's a bit odd and will diagnose him with NT....
This will obviously never happen!

If there can be AS and Autism diagnoses why not also have an NT diagnosis?
"Neurological Typicality" and being "Neurologically Typical" (NT) are
catchphrases used by persons with autism spectrum disorders (including
Asperger's syndrome at the high-functioning end) intended to satirize the
procedures and habits of thought associated with using the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual
series of publications on mental disorder.

Here's a link to how the term entered our language.
  #9  
Old Aug 03, 2013, 09:38 AM
-jimi-'s Avatar
-jimi- -jimi- is offline
Jimi the rat
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 6,316
In a world with mostly aspies, the NT would actually need a diagnosis. Although then aspies would be the norm and not have a diagnosis. The NT would no longer be neurotypical being in minority. The NT disorder would probably be called hypersocial disorder. Aspies would have to help them and offer support as they would suffer because their ill met hypersocial needs. Also the hypersocial probably would be seen as shallow in speech (talk just to talk, no real content) and a tendency not to take tasks seriously and not doing them to perfection. Also I am pretty sure that the hypersocial would have to have extra help in school, because they would be slow learners in some subjects.
__________________
Thanks for this!
Atypical_Disaster, rosska
  #10  
Old Aug 03, 2013, 11:00 AM
rosska's Avatar
rosska rosska is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimi... View Post
In a world with mostly aspies, the NT would actually need a diagnosis. Although then aspies would be the norm and not have a diagnosis. The NT would no longer be neurotypical being in minority. The NT disorder would probably be called hypersocial disorder. Aspies would have to help them and offer support as they would suffer because their ill met hypersocial needs. Also the hypersocial probably would be seen as shallow in speech (talk just to talk, no real content) and a tendency not to take tasks seriously and not doing them to perfection. Also I am pretty sure that the hypersocial would have to have extra help in school, because they would be slow learners in some subjects.
Hahaha, what a world it would be.
Reply
Views: 1135

attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.




 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.