Quote:
Originally Posted by ADDithers
I'm trying to figure out which composers - from Bach to Bruch - that didn't first learn the basics? For the best of them, it was relentless discipline. Unless you're a gifted maverick, and even then, you better hunker down & do your due diligence. Lady can wait!
|
none of them until the more modern ones learned anything about Neapolitan 6 chords, or things like that.... and those aren't the basics either... the stuff i'm having to sit through in my theory class isn't the basics, but stuff i learned when i was in theory 2& 3 at my old school. I know why we need to learn basics and i've got nothing against that... it's good to know what each note is, the value of each note, the time signatures, scales, you know, that kind of stuff. But, even studying other composers works, i don't see why we should even analyze it in the 1st place! But i guess that comes from the fact that i've had someone attempt to analyze one of my compositions, one that i composed using scrabble pieces, adn 2 dice.... although it did humour me a bit for the guy to try to figure out what i was thinking! so maybe that's the thing... maybe the theory teachers think we're amusing the dearly departed composers!