![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Those poor misunderstood therapists.
__________________
Please NO @ Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live. Oscar Wilde Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History - Laurel Thatcher Ulrich Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional. |
![]() atisketatasket, Myrto, Pennster
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
![]() Luce, SoConfused623
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
They do have a responsibility to do what is best for their clients above all else (I am in the field) and I understand the frustration since my last T worked 3 days a week 9-4. I saw her sporadically because of this and even my pdoc was surprised at her limited hours. Most of the Ts I've come across with such limited hours are in private practice and also work somewhere else (doing research, teaching or working in a school for example). In those cases they are fulfilling their responsibilities, just not in that particular practice. Ts who work for a communities agency sometimes have less flexibility - although I think most can be available to see clients until about 7:00 or so. I've never had one that kept weekend hours on a regular basis however. It wasn't an issue for me and isn't unethical if a t doesn't keep them so long as they are able to meet the needs of the community and their clients in some way or another. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm not sure who said it was unethical not to offer access to all patients, I never said that it's unethical. But no, it's not like any business where you only do what's best for yourself. You have to take clients in consideration when making business decisions. That social responsibility does not delineate between those in private practice and those not self-employed. And if you read the social worker ethics, they imply that if you don't live your life in a way that serves others, you have no business being in the profession. It seems like social workers make up the bulk of therapists now. Code of Ethics (English and Spanish) - National Association of Social Workers My point is that as a profession, therapists themselves say they have social responsbility and should consider the welfare of clients unlike other businesses (not sure why people are saying that's not true when they themselves claim this) and as a profession, should contribute to addressing client access issues. That means those who can should 'inconvenience' themselves just a little bit to try to offer access to services to clients of various backgrounds. There are some, like my therapist, who work more non-traditional hours than others to make up the slack for all of those therapists who are more self-centered. It's a free country here; sure, no one HAS to help people. ER doctors and nurses don't get together with their professional organizations and unions and decide they are all going to work 9-5 and have ER techs only staff hospitals after hours. People don't get to work the hours they want when they choose certain professions where people's well-being rather than profit is the focus. This issue actually degrades the credibility of the profession further. If they want to be like any other business, sure, just don't claim to support ethics codes and social responsiblity-don't join and get the benefits of professional organizations or health insurance. Maybe life coach jobs are more fitting for therapists who don't consider the welfare of the population they serve when they make their business decisions. I have no issue with them operating like a business owner and not a health care professional as long as they don't claim to be something they are not. |
![]() Myrto, unaluna
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Not seeing in the code of ethics that therapists who don't offer evening or weekend hours are unethical or obnoxious . . . See no requirement that they do so or implication that in not doing so they shouldn't be in the profession . . . See no evidence that a therapist who keeps regular work hours is less effective at their profession . . . See no definition that says that social responsibility is only defined by their work hours . . .
|
![]() atisketatasket, brillskep, Luce, Wonderfalls
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Also, every therapist is not a social worker and there are a lot of different codes of ethics depending on specialization, association, licensing board, state, country, etc. For example, our national code of ethics where I live clearly states that no one has the right to coerce any psychologist (including psychotherapists) into working one way or another. Now of course, if a therapist is employed, s/he will often have set times when they are at work, but that is different from private practice and no one can legally or ethically impose on a therapist to work certain hours (and those who are employed usually have to work during normal business hours). I understand the frustration when looking for a good therapist is hard enough and then schedule becomes an extra difficulty. But this inconvenience, like any other, is also about how much effort one is willing to put into finding a solution. Therapy is hard work on the part of clients too, not just therapists. If one is determined to enter therapy, I think looking for a professional who works specific hours is just part of the process, just like looking for one who is specialized in a particular issue, for example. And I still think there's something very important to be said about respecting people's choices and boundaries, including time boundaries. There are options these days such as commuting or doing online therapy if one really can't find therapists with open slots and convenient schedules locally. So I believe that in most cases, people who really want to be in therapy won't have to go without just because of schedules. So then what is the specific social responsibility for therapists to work hours that inconvenience them and their families or other clients, colleagues, etc? Yes, clients' needs should be considered. But if one is just looking for a new therapist and interviewing them about their approach, including their hours, then they are not a client yet, and "considered" isn't the same as met at any cost. Last edited by brillskep; Dec 02, 2016 at 10:01 AM. |
![]() atisketatasket, rainboots87
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know about No. 3 as she's in Canada, but the three American therapists I've had fulfill any obligation of social responsibility by giving several talks to local groups for free each month, running free marriage retreats and seminars for couples, and being on call to local hospitals, uncompensated, to do EMDR or other therapies for patients or their families. 2 once was called to the hospital to help a family who had just made the decision to take their 4-year-old son off life support through the aftermath.
To me social responsibility is more about responsibility to society as a whole, not about extended office hours. |
![]() brillskep, Luce, rainboots87, SoConfused623
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Indeed, if a therapist works very long hours, they can become too tired and do more harm than good. Then the more socially responsible thing to do is not to take those extra hours of work, even if it means extra income or more clients.
|
![]() atisketatasket, Luce, rainboots87
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Human services professions do consider client access to services as a social responsibility of the profession. It has nothing to do with working long hours, forcing therapists to work when they can't, having to work weekends, accepting all clients for every situation, etc.
My post is more related to those who say they have no responsibility to populations they serve when making business decisions. That's a business, not a profession. Those affiliated with a profession have committed to a set of values, behaviors, and standards. |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
But a variety of hours does not necessarily mean more hours - just different hours. 9-5 on Monday Wed Fri and 12-8 on T/ Th for example.
__________________
Please NO @ Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live. Oscar Wilde Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History - Laurel Thatcher Ulrich Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional. |
![]() Lauliza, Myrto
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Please NO @ Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live. Oscar Wilde Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History - Laurel Thatcher Ulrich Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional. |
![]() brillskep
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
That's also true. Most therapists here work either a variety of hours or mostly evenings. Before this thread, I had never been exposed to this scheduling issue.
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, it doesn't say most of these things. Of course an ethics code wouldn't say "therapists who don't offer evening or weekend hours are unethical or obnoxious". I'm not sure where those expectations come from.
![]() It also, expectedly, doesn't say "therapists should run their practice in ways that primarily serve their own interests and without concern for the population you are providing services too". Quote:
|
![]() Myrto
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
But you assume that having regular work hours is "without concern for the population they are providing services to." If a therapist is serving a full load of clients consistently and effectively with regular work hours, how is he not serving the needs of the clients he is providing services to? If he/she is apparently meeting the needs of the clients he is currently serving and is serving a full load of clients within those hours, I don't see a failure there.
|
![]() atisketatasket, brillskep, rainboots87, ScarletPimpernel, SoConfused623, UnderRugSwept, Wonderfalls
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
I don't have any idea of where you are getting that from. I haven't 'assumed' anything. This is what I've been saying:
Quote:
What i should add is that it's up to each individual practitioner how they address things like access to services. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
I was quoting your post. Were those your words or did you quote someone else?
|
![]() brillskep
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
What is the population they serve, though? Existing clients? The wider community? Seems like a lot hinges on how one defines that.
|
![]() brillskep, UnderRugSwept
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
True. And if they are serving their population and community apparently effectively and it is working for them and their population, that should be all that really matters. They can't be all things to all people. They can be what is needed for their population and community, and if it is working, if they are booked and already working full time, as the old saying goes, "if it ain't broke . . ."
|
![]() brillskep, rainboots87, ScarletPimpernel, UnderRugSwept
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Lola, I have been saying, and said in my first post that therapists as a profession have the responsibility to look out for client interests rather than only their personal/business interests. Client interest is part of business decision making. I've mentioned before that it's up to therapists how they want to carry out their responsibilities, and I talk about this more at the macro level.
This was in response to those who said things like as long as a therapist gets the clients they need...and if working 9-4 is what they want to do, then they have no obligation, etc. This is not true for those who joined organizations by committing to ethics codes that state it's not all about the therapist's needs. There is expected to be some balance. These professional organizations have a lot of clout with government regulators, Congress, etc. That 'clout' is because their members support the codes and contribute to social good. The codes are not mere pieces of paper. But they are losing their credibility when members ignore the standards. They are also making it worse for themselves, because when they have no credibility, which is what happens to people/organizations who say one thing and do another, those policymakers who once took their side of things into account end up making rules forcing them to do things that they themselves chose not to do. It's happening now with the new Medicare programs, currently a topic in Trump policy. When therapists get their affiliation with these organizations, it does not means they commit to following through with responsiblities they committed to. If they don't, they have no business being a member of these organizations, per the organizations. And that's fine if they want to make their business decisions based on their own well-being and preferences and nothing else, but not if they want to be an APA or other member. I think like Stopdog said, however, other organizations' standards are eroding. I do see a trend in that. Probably don't have much more to say about the subject. Quote:
Quote:
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Balance would be the key word. I much prefer a mental health professional who is able to keep a balance in their life that keeps them and their own life in a balanced, healthy place rather than always putting others first. Perhaps that is why so many mental health workers are underpaid, get burned out, perhaps have problems with boundaries . . . just a thought.
Compassion Fatigue: Being an Ethical Social Worker - SocialWorker.com |
![]() brillskep, rainboots87
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
i understand what your mean and agree with this. however i don't think the issue is that therapists should work longer hours or burn themselves out to cater to clients. I think most posters are just saying that Ts should keep more flexible hours, which as a T (almost) I think is true. As a service provider your obligation is to accommodate the people who want those services. That does mean keeping a schedule that might fit outside the usual mode, at least a couple of days a week, so clients can see you. Yes, if a 9-5 schedule works for the Ts clients then it is probably a non issue. Most of the time, however, Ts have to structure their hours to suit people who can't see them during the standard day. That means simply having a day where you stay until 7 or 8 and then another where you start earlier in the morning. This is the responsibility that the counseling ethics codes are talking about (along with the pro bono work they are supposed to do sometimes). Working weekends is totally the Ts choice and usually isn't expected in an outpatient level of care. A therapist's schedule is unlikely to ever be a reason for burnout unless they over extend themselves- a boundary issue on the T's part and not the clients problem. Last edited by Lauliza; Dec 03, 2016 at 10:18 AM. |
![]() atisketatasket
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Again, the OP started with the statement that not offering evening or weekend hours is "obnoxious" and others added that anyone who can't accommodate evening or weekend hours, putting clients first, should never even enter the profession in the first place. However, person after person commented that their therapist does offer at least some evening or weekend hours, so apparently this isn't as obnoxious a problem as was originally posted, and people are finding therapists who do keep hours they can work with. My contention is that a therapist who chooses to keep regular (9-5 or 6) hours which apparently work fine for his clients and for his own personal life is not being obnoxious nor should he/she accused of not putting clients first or should it be argued they should never have entered the profession at all. I am simply going on claims/statements made directly by people on this thread.
As a family person, I do believe family MUST be placed first in a person's life. How many people here are in therapy for the fact that their own families did not place the health and welfare of their families first and foremost in their lives? It seems completely counter to everything we know about the importance of supportive families and good parenting to say therapists MUST put others before their own families and their own personal welfare. (Personally, I don't think that is quite what the ethics code intends, but since it keeps being quoted as the justification and reason these hours MUST be provided, then it is open for argument.) |
![]() brillskep, Luce, ScarletPimpernel, UnderRugSwept
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks Lauliza for reiterating what people have been saying here. It's like I was saying the sky is orange. The responses said but no, the sky is purple. Then everyone thanks, 'likes' the post that said the sky is purple. This is nuts. |
Reply |
|