Home Menu

Menu


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 30, 2013, 09:01 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
I thought that it has long been outlawed, but I stumbled upon VCF contraceptive film looking for prescription drugs on walmart's pharmacy website.

It has not been outlawed.

Not only do spermicides prevent pregnancy solely in otherwise infertile women (in my experience), they increase the transmission rate of HIV - lovely.

From National Public Radio:

What Spermicide Users Should Know, But Often Don't : Shots - Health News : NPR

Anyway, I have never seen it mentioned on here so probably everyone is in the know already, but I thought I'd post.

Seriously I thought it was recalled more than a decade ago.

advertisement
  #2  
Old May 30, 2013, 09:12 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
Why would spermicide be believed to prevent HIV? And why would anyone by a product that can affect PREGNANCY or STD's and not read the damn directions? Seriously?

You should ALWAYS read the directions of any sexual products, no matter how "experienced" you are.
  #3  
Old May 30, 2013, 09:16 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
The point is that it INCREASES the chances of HIV transmission. Nor does it prevent pregnancy, in my experience, unless, again, you are infertile to begin with or your male partner is infertile to begin with, but if somebody is infertile to begin with, it is both a waste of money to buy spermicide and a risk factor for HIV transmission.

If something INCREASES the chances of HIV transmission, it should not be on supermarket shelves - this is not a caveat emptor situation.
  #4  
Old May 30, 2013, 09:21 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
Well if you had HIV you wouldn't be using spermicide in the first place.

edit: The point of spermicide is to stop the sperm from moving and reaching the egg. If you have HIV, you wouldn't want any sperm at all to enter the vagina so you would be wearing a condom, and you don't use spermicide and condoms together. Also, the article and planned parenthood said that spermicide can cause skin irritation if used multiple times a day, so if you are someone who has sex frequently, you'd need to use another form of birth control. Again, that's why you research before choosing a product and read the directions to make sure it's the right one for you.
  #5  
Old May 30, 2013, 09:59 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSkipper View Post
you don't use spermicide and condoms together
if you use spermicide alone and are otherwise healthy, you end up pregnant, so there is no point in using spermicide alone
  #6  
Old May 30, 2013, 10:33 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
You are not supposed to use spermicide alone. You are supposed to use it with a female condom. If women always use spermicide as directed, 15 out of 100 will become pregnant each year.

I'm not going to argue it any further, as everything I've learned I've learned from the article above and the planned parenthood article. Why argue about it if you're not stating any facts. The point I'm trying to make is to read the directions.

Spermicide Effectiveness - Spermicides
  #7  
Old May 30, 2013, 10:36 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSkipper View Post
If women always use spermicide as directed, 15 out of 100 will become pregnant each year.
To me, that means you would end up pregnant. I do not use protection that is less than 99% effective. 15 out to 100 is a HUGE RISK.

So there is no point - it is like playing Russian roulette.
  #8  
Old May 30, 2013, 10:51 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamster-bamster View Post
To me, that means you would end up pregnant. I do not use protection that is less than 99% effective. 15 out to 100 is a HUGE RISK.

So there is no point - it is like playing Russian roulette.
Um, the only thing that is 100% effective from getting pregnant is 1) abstinence and 2) sterilization. And sterilization isn't 100% effective from STD's, in fact not at all, so you would have to use some other form of protection on top of that. What do you use?
  #9  
Old May 30, 2013, 10:53 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
I don't understand why are you bringing this up if you have no intentions of using it but only want to condemn it for it's lack of effectiveness?
  #10  
Old May 30, 2013, 10:58 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Mirena IUD + condoms - remember how to calculate the probability of two independent events co-occurring?..
  #11  
Old May 30, 2013, 11:00 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamster-bamster View Post
Mirena IUD + condoms - remember how to calculate the probability of two independent events co-occurring?..
There's still a chance, even if a fraction. It's probably the most effective but not 100% effective.
  #12  
Old May 30, 2013, 11:01 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Actually, the manufacturer's website claims that Mirena alone

is highly effective at preventing pregnancy, over 99%, and I am willing to believe it because I used it alone for many years when married without any incidents, but now that I have non-monogamous relationships, I also use condoms, which means that the effectiveness of what I use surpasses that of sterilization via tubal ligation (the old method) and has added benefits because Mirena removes menstruation and cramps and adds a bit of cancer prevention protection.
  #13  
Old May 30, 2013, 11:02 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSkipper View Post
There's still a chance, even if a fraction. It's probably the most effective but not 100% effective.
the only 100% effective is the new method of female sterilization that is called essure, but Mirena+Condoms is basically the same in practical terms. Essure is completely failure-free - no reported failures in the whole history of use.

essure also far surpasses the old female sterilization via tubal ligation because it is non-invasive, outpatient, etc. etc. - basically the best possible solution if you are really sure you do not want to get pregnant. But - also completely irreversible, while tubal ligation can sometimes be reversed.
  #14  
Old May 30, 2013, 11:43 PM
nicoleb2's Avatar
nicoleb2 nicoleb2 is offline
Magnate
 
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamster-bamster View Post
Actually, the manufacturer's website claims that Mirena alone

is highly effective at preventing pregnancy, over 99%, and I am willing to believe it because I used it alone for many years when married without any incidents, but now that I have non-monogamous relationships, I also use condoms, which means that the effectiveness of what I use surpasses that of sterilization via tubal ligation (the old method) and has added benefits because Mirena removes menstruation and cramps and adds a bit of cancer prevention protection.
Look up mirena iud pregnancy and you will find many many stories of women for whom the mirena has failed. Mirena was awesome for me though, and I would definitely recommend it
  #15  
Old May 30, 2013, 11:52 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicoleb2 View Post
Look up mirena iud pregnancy and you will find many many stories of women for whom the mirena has failed. Mirena was awesome for me though, and I would definitely recommend it
Well, I agree that I should not have quoted the manufacturer's website since it is biased, but internet stories are not reliable either - that is for sure. Planned Parenthood which is both reliable and unbiased reports that

Less than 1 out of 100 women will get pregnant each year if they use the ParaGard or the Mirena IUD.
  #16  
Old May 30, 2013, 11:54 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicoleb2 View Post
Look up mirena iud pregnancy and you will find many many stories of women for whom the mirena has failed.
Most women for whom Mirena has not failed do not post internet stories but rather enjoy the convenience of worry-free sex in their free time.

In other words, there exists a huge reporting bias when you read internet stories about anything under the sun, Mirena not excepted.

I am glad it worked so well for you.
  #17  
Old May 31, 2013, 02:33 AM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSkipper View Post
There's still a chance, even if a fraction. It's probably the most effective but not 100% effective.
Technically speaking, everything but essure allows for a chance/fraction. technically speaking.

However, if you calculate the chance would be negligible.

Do the math and:

1) webMD: How Effective Are Male Condoms at Birth Control?

Condoms are about 85% effective for birth control. With careful use, they are even more effective.

So 0.15 probability of failure with not quite careful use.

2) Mirena - more than 99% effective per Planned Parenthood. So let us say 0.01 probability of failure.

3) the failure of condoms and the failure of IUD are independent events

4) the probability of a co-occurence is thus (because of (3) above) a product of the probabilities of individual failures

5) 0.15*0.01=0.0015. That is an underestimate because I overestimated the failure rate of both methods.

If this is not equal to 100% effectiveness for you, in practical terms, you should never drive a car.
  #18  
Old May 31, 2013, 12:17 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
Common birth control is 99% effective too when used properly and women still end up pregnant.
  #19  
Old May 31, 2013, 12:22 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSkipper View Post
Common birth control is 99% effective too when used properly and women still end up pregnant.
what is "common birth control"?
  #20  
Old May 31, 2013, 10:50 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
I'm not arguing with you any further, considering you insist on being right.
  #21  
Old May 31, 2013, 11:00 PM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
I asked a question which was not arguing.
  #22  
Old May 31, 2013, 11:42 PM
LiteraryLark's Avatar
LiteraryLark LiteraryLark is offline
Crowned "The Good Witch"
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,542
This entire thread you've been arguing for the sake of arguing. I'm done with it.
  #23  
Old Jun 01, 2013, 01:33 AM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
I posted the post in an effort to educate the readers because I was appalled when I found out that a product that facilitates the transmission of HIV is on the market.

I did not expect any responses - it was just an informative one-off post.

You responded, and, yes, started... ARGUING.

I said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by hamster-bamster View Post
...

... spermicides ... increase the transmission rate of HIV
You responded with:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSkipper View Post
Why would spermicide be believed to prevent HIV?
... and that was not only ARGUING, but basic lack of attention to the wording of OP, because I reported that spermicide INCREASES the transmission of HIV, which has nothing to do with whether it PREVENTS HIV, right?..
Reply
Views: 3347

attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.




 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.