FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#1
My evil boss finally got demoted last month, but they kept her on chromatography where I work. She tried to commit fraud AGAIN and the chief didn't seem to think it was a bid deal. I reported it to the QA manager. They still won;t take her out of chromatography in spite of me being very blunt and saying that she's a CROOK. Then today the chief gave me a reprimand for talking about her fraud out in the open where people heard me. My ex-boss is making a case against me for creating a hostile workplace. A couple of months ago when she was my boss she threatened to get me fired for refusing to participate in lab fraud. Now she acts like she's the victim. I have 4 years 8 months to retirement. No way I'm going to make it.
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
Reply With Quote |
Open Eyes, RoxanneToto, ThunderGoddess, Turtle_Rider, unaluna
|
Grand Member
Member Since Nov 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 854
8 89 hugs
given |
#2
I think you should take the advice of your current boss and leave it alone or you will end up fighting for what's "right" and end up unemployed...and "right." Your ex-boss will continue on with life.
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#3
So the crooks always win. That's the way it was at my last job. The honest hard workers got laid off and the crooks kept their jobs. The problem is that if I don't at least push back I become one of the crooks. And being the low guy on the totem pole I would get the blame and get fired.
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
Reply With Quote |
RoxanneToto, unaluna
|
Grand Member
Member Since Nov 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 854
8 89 hugs
given |
#4
Yes, generally they do. If you mind your own biz life is a lot easier.
|
Reply With Quote |
unaluna
|
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#5
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
Reply With Quote |
RoxanneToto, unaluna
|
Legendary Wise Elder
Member Since Dec 2014
Location: US
Posts: 22,517
(SuperPoster!)
9 1,280 hugs
given |
#6
If you are required to report fraud, then of course make a report. Privately.
Talking about it in the open when others could hear is a different story. Or keep pushing it by calling her a crook. Make a report and let them deal with it If you already reported it, then you can’t be liable as you addressed it. The fact that they do nothing about it or aren’t firing her isn’t your business really. If you continue talking about it, you will be seen as the one causing problems. Now if you feel you are forced to commit fraud or crime despite you making reports about it, perhaps you should look for a different job. |
Reply With Quote |
Molinit, RoxanneToto, unaluna
|
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#7
Quote:
A different job would be ideal, but it's not easy to get a good job. My other option is to report this further up the chain ti the head of HR. Lots of people at my workplace did the wrong things because my ex-boss convinced them that it was ok. I just found out that our HR administrator was changed. It may be one of those things I was told is happening behind the scenes that I'm not allowed to know about. But our HR admin is still 2 levels below the head of HR. This is a big government operation and there is a huge bureaucracy. __________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
|
Reply With Quote |
RoxanneToto
|
Grand Poohbah
Member Since Aug 2020
Location: England
Posts: 1,692
3 6,991 hugs
given |
#8
I would try going further up the chain, though it’s also risky because your chief is likely to figure out who made the reports, even if you can do it anonymously. Is it worth the risk, to you?
|
Reply With Quote |
Legendary Wise Elder
Member Since Dec 2014
Location: US
Posts: 22,517
(SuperPoster!)
9 1,280 hugs
given |
#9
I am not saying you shouldn’t care about it but it’s not up to you if they do anything about it or not. Report it to higher ups and if they demand you sign on fraudulent data, make report about it too showing what you were told to sign. Or make police report. You can’t make them do what you want them to do though.
|
Reply With Quote |
unaluna
|
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#10
Quote:
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
|
Reply With Quote |
Turtle_Rider
|
Legendary Wise Elder
Member Since Dec 2014
Location: US
Posts: 22,517
(SuperPoster!)
9 1,280 hugs
given |
#11
What kind of fraud is she committing? Is this the same boss that wouldn’t let you take time off?
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#12
Quote:
In a chemistry lab t is fraud not to conduct analysis according to proper methods and procedures and she likes to make up her own methods. She bullied me and my coworker and ordered us to run an instrument in a way that would lead to inaccurate results. It's chromatography and she made us use a setting that allowed nitrite to co-elute with carbonate - that means they weren't separated. Then method clearly says you must separate the analyses. It's basic to chromatography. She then threatened to get me fired when I had her order countermanded. But that order was not countermanded by the chief for an entire week. That's really bad for the chief. She should have jumped in right away when I e-mailed her and said it was unethical. So she's guilty too. Then when I told the QA manager and they did an investigation they whitewashed it. The QA manager and director had a meeting with me and said they wanted to 'move forward.' Instead of dealing with a week of compromised data. I told them in the meeting that moving forward isn't so easy because that data is on the instrument and in our files and any auditor who looks at it would see what happened. It would e very difficult to answer for what happened. There is no way that it could be justified in my opinion as a scientist who has 10 years experience in chromatography. The cover-up is often worse that the crime in many cases. They never told customers that the results were in question and should be rerun. They are guilty of a cover-up. But they moved forward and stupidly let my ex-boss run chromatography after she had been demoted. That was also against my advise. It didn't take long for her to commit the classic example of chromatography lab fraud - peak shaving and peak juicing. The reporting limit standard failed in an analysis so she shaved a peak. When I said you couldn't do that she juiced a peak in the calibration. Quote:
When you do that all data is compromised and reporting it is considered wire fraud or mail fraud depending on how the results were reported. A couple of years ago it happened here: Quote:
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace Last edited by AceRimmer; Aug 23, 2021 at 06:16 PM.. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Anonymous43372
|
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#13
To finish rather than editing again after I refused to sign off on her improper integrations the chief said she would sign off on the analysis even though the reporting limits failed. I felt pressured and agreed, but then thought better of it and was going to e-mail HR. But my coworker convinced me to keep it inside the lab and report to the QA manager again. Our procedures say if the reporting limits fail you have to recalibrate and rerun. I had showed them how the data could ethically be reprocessed as a way of recalibrating but my ex-boss did not agree to that. We have used my new integration parameters in subsequent analyses but I found out they have been held up because my ex-boss didn't agree with them. She is falsely claiming that I said I would refuse to follow our procedure. I never said I wouldn't follow a PROPER procedure. I only said I would not do the improper things that were written into the procedure by my ex-boss. Yes, there is more. We spike samples and if they fail you are supposed to qualify results. She wrote into the procedure that you can dilute the sample and spike that. That would also be lab fraud so I said I would not to it. It never should have been in the procedure. I had objected to it in the past, but I was ignored.
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
Reply With Quote |
Threadtastic Postaholic
Member Since Dec 2018
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,006
(SuperPoster!)
5 192 hugs
given |
#14
Quote:
__________________ "I carried a watermelon?" President of the no F's given society. |
|
Reply With Quote |
lizardlady
|
Human
Member Since Apr 2014
Location: Home
Posts: 8,356
(SuperPoster!)
10 1,275 hugs
given |
#15
Hi Ace,
I totally understand your concerns. Other than the reporting you've already done (it's not your job to enforce or follow up on the reports) I'd say your options are to continue to report as it occurs and maintain yourself a standard of ethics that is above reproach and/or find a new job. I would document all the reports you've made and all conversations, because regardless, you don't want to get thrown under the bus for what your supervisors are failing to take care of. __________________ What if I fall? Oh, my dear, but what if you fly? Primary Dx: C-PTSD and Severe Chronic Treatment Resistant Major Depressive Disorder Secondary Dx: Generalized Anxiety Disorder with mild Agoraphobia. Meds I've tried: Prozac, Zoloft, Celexa, Effexor, Remeron, Elavil, Wellbutrin, Risperidone, Abilify, Prazosin, Paxil, Trazadone, Tramadol, Topomax, Xanax, Propranolol, Valium, Visteril, Vraylar, Selinor, Clonopin, Ambien Treatments I've done: CBT, DBT, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Talk therapy, psychotherapy, exercise, diet, sleeping more, sleeping less... |
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#16
Quote:
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#17
My coworker was on the verge of tears after work today. She says she's going to retire soon because the stress is too much for her. Her name is on some of the fraudulent data and she's worried about what happens if an auditor starts asking her about it. I told he we could try taking to HR about the situation and say it's a hostile work environment. She doesn't think that will help, but I said we don;t have much to lose at this point. The department head hired a mediator but I complained to him that my she threatened to fire me. But now the unit coordinator says that wasn't really a threat to fire me. Head games.
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#18
They finally kicked my ex-boss out of chromatography permanently. It's a huge relief. It still means that she gets less work and I get more. Next year we get audited too. I don't know what will happen then. The ethics investigation should be on record. I can't imagine that the auditor won't have questions about it.
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
Reply With Quote |
Anonymous43372
|
seesaw
|
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#19
The ex-boss is going to retire at the end of the year. We have a new executive director too. I don;t know if I should let her know about the turmoil in my section. I still may have to report the lab fraud and I don't think it would be right without going to her first. The previous exec new about it and covered it up.
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
Reply With Quote |
Anonymous43372
|
Member
Member Since Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 340
8 2 hugs
given |
#20
Quote:
__________________ The Universe needs an Ace |
|
Reply With Quote |
Anonymous43372, Open Eyes
|