Home Menu

Menu


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old Jan 19, 2012, 02:40 PM
amandalouise's Avatar
amandalouise amandalouise is offline
Wise Elder
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: 8CS / NYS / USA
Posts: 9,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luce View Post
I struggle when I read threads like this. I don't even believe in the whole concept of a core. The latest research and theory about DID is that there is no core - alters are not created out of nowhere to protect a 'core' personality, they are dissociated parts of the whole, and each is as important to the whole as any other. The scientific understanding of the structure of dissociation has come so far over the last 20 years, and I eagerly await the day when the new theories and knowledge filter down into psychiatric and psychology training and literature... then noone will have to needlessly angst over thier inability to indentify their 'core', believing that if they can't they will never be able to be tested accurately or diagnosed correctly!
Luse maybe I can help you understand the core concept.

A baby is born. mentally and physically that baby is one whole person.
At age two that same whole child gets abused by someone they know.
this child has to be around this abuser.
physical pains heal but mental pain doesnt always heal right away.

imagine having to be around / near / talk to / be nice to / mind your manners with /respect someone who has hit you, raped you, pulled your hair, and other horrors.

its sometimes easy for adults to bite their tongue or walk away from those that do wrong to them.

but this 2 yr old child has been taught you dont say no, you mind your elders, dont walk away when Im talking to you, dont be sassy...

now the child is in mental stress. this child is being physically and mentally abused and cannot get away from the abuser and cannot tell anyone whats going on either.

so the child dissociates. they mentally separate a part of their self. the side they dissociate away from their self is an alter and the rest is the core.

Another word for the "core" is called the "host" the person in which the alters live inside of.

As time goes on and more physical and mental abuse happens. the "core" (host) splits off more parts of their self.

the parts of their self that is split off is called the alters and the person in which all the alters live in is called the "core" or in some places called "the host"

sometimes the host (other wise called the core) dissociates so much that it is the alters that are taking care of every day life, and the host (core) dissociates their self into a daydream world where they feel safe.

now you have my alters Sunny, Rainy, Opal, Thistle, Red, Yellow and Green getting up in the morning, making breakfast, getting the family off to school and work, going to work, paying the bills, taking care of the children, watching tv,....

and the host (otherwise called the "core") is off in their mental dream world hidden from the outside the body world.

if the host (core) is hidden like this it can take yrs before any communication between the alters and the host can take place.

here on psych central we have many different people from many different locations from around the world.

some places use the term "core" to describe the person in which the alters live. Some places use the term "host" to describe the person in which the alters live. and some places like here in NY use the two terms interchangeably.

Everyone here on psych central is at different places in the healing too.

some people are in the denial stage.
some people are in the establish communication stage
some people are in the working together as a team stage
some people are in the discovering what their alters parts and their host(core) parts system is
and some people are in the integration stage.

the "core concept" is the same as your "parts of a whole concept". its just that people are using the wording from their own locations and from where they are along the healing path.
Thanks for this!
RapidFlyer

advertisement
  #27  
Old Jan 19, 2012, 02:48 PM
amandalouise's Avatar
amandalouise amandalouise is offline
Wise Elder
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: 8CS / NYS / USA
Posts: 9,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claritytoo View Post
I thought that when you find your core, that person becomes the leader and moves everyone toward sharing with everyone else. I am still confused by how it all works.
for some people the core (host) is the leader that moves everyone towards sharing with everyone else.

for others it is the alters that are in the leadership position in the system that gets everyone sharing and working together as a team.

it all depends on what type of system of alters and host(core) you have and how much co consciousness you have in the system and host (core).

I making a guess here that you are trying to come up with how everything "should" and "has to" be for how things work by comparing how DID affects everyone else to you.

I know I keep saying this but its how DID works -

everyone has their own ways in which DID has affected them. Though there is diagnostic criteria that everyone with DID meets, everyone with DID is different. there is no one set way DID works.

it affects one person this way and that person another way and another person another way and .....

how ever DID is affecting you is how it works.
Thanks for this!
RapidFlyer
  #28  
Old Jan 19, 2012, 11:21 PM
RapidFlyer's Avatar
RapidFlyer RapidFlyer is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: N. East PA
Posts: 277
I have learned a lot here. I look forward to learning even more. thanks everyone for sharing with me on a subject I never felt like I could talk about before.

I feel so safe here. I can't tell you all how wonderful that is for me.

Thanks again. I'm exhausted. I'll write more tomorrow.
__________________


In the journey we learn and grow. The destination shows us how very far we have come and how far we have yet to go.
  #29  
Old Jan 20, 2012, 12:56 AM
LeafLace LeafLace is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luce View Post
The latest research and theory about DID is that there is no core - alters are not created out of nowhere to protect a 'core' personality, they are dissociated parts of the whole, and each is as important to the whole as any other.
This theory makes the most sense to me of anything I've read. I'm quite sure I've been dissociating nearly all my life for different reasons. I don't believe I ever developed enough of a 'core' before it started happening to have one to pinpoint, let alone return to. As they say about PTSD, "You can't return to a state that never was in the first place." (Can't remember who said it but I love that saying.)
  #30  
Old Jan 20, 2012, 01:25 AM
LeafLace LeafLace is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmee2 View Post
i have a question...does anyone have a medical condition that some of the insiders do not have?

The question is off the subject of this post i know. i am not sure why the question came up for me. Please excuse this post.
I'm not sure if this is what you mean but one part of me has knee pain. I've realized that I can recognize that I have the knee pain all the time but only one part of me can feel the pain and when I can, it's intense.

I also once had an abscessed tooth for a year and beyond the same kind of dull pain I feel in my knees, had no idea. When told, I was dumbfounded. I should've been in agony and I wasn't. There wasn't even a significant amount of swelling.

Also, some parts of me have asthma, others don't. Some parts get headaches, others don't. There are also the habits that vary between parts, which I gather most people have. The one that baffles me, and this is veering even further of topic, I'm afraid is that I've yet to meet a part of me that would turn down a cup of coffee, even the littles and we all seem to like it pretty much the same way.
  #31  
Old Jan 20, 2012, 06:45 AM
Luce Luce is offline
Magnate
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by amandalouise View Post
Luse maybe I can help you understand the core concept.

A baby is born. mentally and physically that baby is one whole person.
At age two that same whole child gets abused by someone they know.
this child has to be around this abuser.
physical pains heal but mental pain doesnt always heal right away.

imagine having to be around / near / talk to / be nice to / mind your manners with /respect someone who has hit you, raped you, pulled your hair, and other horrors.

its sometimes easy for adults to bite their tongue or walk away from those that do wrong to them.

but this 2 yr old child has been taught you dont say no, you mind your elders, dont walk away when Im talking to you, dont be sassy...

now the child is in mental stress. this child is being physically and mentally abused and cannot get away from the abuser and cannot tell anyone whats going on either.

so the child dissociates. they mentally separate a part of their self. the side they dissociate away from their self is an alter and the rest is the core.

Another word for the "core" is called the "host" the person in which the alters live inside of.

As time goes on and more physical and mental abuse happens. the "core" (host) splits off more parts of their self.

the parts of their self that is split off is called the alters and the person in which all the alters live in is called the "core" or in some places called "the host"

sometimes the host (other wise called the core) dissociates so much that it is the alters that are taking care of every day life, and the host (core) dissociates their self into a daydream world where they feel safe.

now you have my alters Sunny, Rainy, Opal, Thistle, Red, Yellow and Green getting up in the morning, making breakfast, getting the family off to school and work, going to work, paying the bills, taking care of the children, watching tv,....

and the host (otherwise called the "core") is off in their mental dream world hidden from the outside the body world.

if the host (core) is hidden like this it can take yrs before any communication between the alters and the host can take place.

here on psych central we have many different people from many different locations from around the world.

some places use the term "core" to describe the person in which the alters live. Some places use the term "host" to describe the person in which the alters live. and some places like here in NY use the two terms interchangeably.

Everyone here on psych central is at different places in the healing too.

some people are in the denial stage.
some people are in the establish communication stage
some people are in the working together as a team stage
some people are in the discovering what their alters parts and their host(core) parts system is
and some people are in the integration stage.

the "core concept" is the same as your "parts of a whole concept". its just that people are using the wording from their own locations and from where they are along the healing path.
Actually Amanda, that is what people USED to believe about dissociation and DID. Current scientific theory has moved on from that and that old information is no longer part of the recommended treatment approach for DID.
Current theory is that in normal childhood development the personality is not integrated until around age 6 or 7, and abuse and /or trauma that occurs before that time does not create a split, but instead causes the failure of personality to integrate. In current scientific theory about Dissociative Identity Disorder there is not a core or birth personality that splits off to protect itself - there is one whole personality that fails to integrate its normal separate parts. With time and repetition of abuse, and without restorative integrative experiences these separate parts continue to separate and develop indepedently of one another. But the crucial difference is there is no 'core'. All parts are equally important aspects of the original developing self.
I eagerly await the day the new theories, ideas and corresponding treatment practices are widespread throughout the world. They are currently being used in Europe and Australisia, but for some reason the US lags behind and insists on clinging to the old beliefs. Why would that be?
Thanks for this!
LeafLace
  #32  
Old Jan 20, 2012, 04:43 PM
amandalouise's Avatar
amandalouise amandalouise is offline
Wise Elder
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: 8CS / NYS / USA
Posts: 9,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luce View Post
Actually Amanda, that is what people USED to believe about dissociation and DID. Current scientific theory has moved on from that and that old information is no longer part of the recommended treatment approach for DID.
Current theory is that in normal childhood development the personality is not integrated until around age 6 or 7, and abuse and /or trauma that occurs before that time does not create a split, but instead causes the failure of personality to integrate. In current scientific theory about Dissociative Identity Disorder there is not a core or birth personality that splits off to protect itself - there is one whole personality that fails to integrate its normal separate parts. With time and repetition of abuse, and without restorative integrative experiences these separate parts continue to separate and develop indepedently of one another. But the crucial difference is there is no 'core'. All parts are equally important aspects of the original developing self.
I eagerly await the day the new theories, ideas and corresponding treatment practices are widespread throughout the world. They are currently being used in Europe and Australisia, but for some reason the US lags behind and insists on clinging to the old beliefs. Why would that be?
that may be where you are but here where I am - New york United states of america what I posted is what the mental health community believes here.

thanks for the info though. its pretty cool. if you have any up to date professional resources about what you have posted I am interested in reading it and showing some of my co workers and my own mental health treatment providers.
  #33  
Old Jan 20, 2012, 11:12 PM
Luce Luce is offline
Magnate
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,709
This one is a good start, although it only touches on the structural theory of dissociation. I have to go out now, so I'll look up more later.
http://www.isst-d.org/jtd/2011AdultT...nesSummary.pdf

A quote from it:

Developmental models of DID posit that the disorder does not arise
from a previously mature, unified mind or core personality that becomes
shattered or fractured. Rather, DID results from a failure of normal developmental
integration, which is caused by overwhelming experiences and
disturbed caregiver–child interactions (including neglect and the failure
to respond) during critical early developmental periods. This, in turn,
leads some traumatized children to develop relatively discrete, personified
behavioral states or subsystems of their core personality.
Thanks for this!
amandalouise
  #34  
Old Jan 21, 2012, 07:37 AM
Claritytoo Claritytoo is offline
Poohbah
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luce View Post
This one is a good start, although it only touches on the structural theory of dissociation. I have to go out now, so I'll look up more later.
http://www.isst-d.org/jtd/2011AdultT...nesSummary.pdf

A quote from it:

Developmental models of DID posit that the disorder does not arise
from a previously mature, unified mind or core personality that becomes
shattered or fractured. Rather, DID results from a failure of normal developmental
integration, which is caused by overwhelming experiences and
disturbed caregiver–child interactions (including neglect and the failure
to respond) during critical early developmental periods. This, in turn,
leads some traumatized children to develop relatively discrete, personified
behavioral states or subsystems of their core personality.

How does this apply when I have an alter that is 16 yrs old, and I first met when I was 16. How does this apply when I have an alter that is in her 40's and doesn't have the same hair color I have. If what you say is true than I should have past that developmental stage by age 16 and age 40. I can see how that could apply to my young ones but not how it applies to all the others. The ones that happened later in life? Please tell me how your post applies to them. I am trying to learn.
Thanks for this!
amandalouise
  #35  
Old Jan 21, 2012, 05:44 PM
Luce Luce is offline
Magnate
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,709
Clairtytoo, it applies in the same way that it does according to the belief of one having a unified core personality that creates splits before the age of 6. This theory proposes that in normal development a child begins life with an unintegrated personality, and that their emotional states become integrated in the first six years of life through normalising experiences and 'typical' parental care. If this doesn't occur the emotional states fail to integrate (such as in borderline personality disorder) and in extreme cases, DID.
In the case of DID the emotional states continue to develop their own sense of identity and separateness and dissociation and further splitting becomes the primary response to further trauma, stress, and other life circumstances. Further splitting and creation of dissociated states can occur at any point in life and it isn't necessary for a person to have passed through a certain life stage to have alters of that age. Identity states (alters) can be of any age, any race, any gender: they can be animals, inanimate objects, 'supernatural beings' - anything. They are whatever the dissociating child needs them to be. Even typical integrated people may have aspects of themselves that behave and think more maturely in certain situations. The difference in people with DID is that these mature aspects of self take on a separate, older identity. What they are NOT is actual people. For instance, you don't actually have a 40 year old woman living in your body, although you (and probably she) would likely argue differently! I know my some of my alts absolutely and uncategorically denied that they were anything other than 100% real, actual beings. But they are not - they are dissociated identity states of the person that is me.
Thanks for this!
amandalouise, LeafLace
  #36  
Old Jan 21, 2012, 08:23 PM
Claritytoo Claritytoo is offline
Poohbah
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luce View Post
Clairtytoo, it applies in the same way that it does according to the belief of one having a unified core personality that creates splits before the age of 6. This theory proposes that in normal development a child begins life with an unintegrated personality, and that their emotional states become integrated in the first six years of life through normalising experiences and 'typical' parental care. If this doesn't occur the emotional states fail to integrate (such as in borderline personality disorder) and in extreme cases, DID.
In the case of DID the emotional states continue to develop their own sense of identity and separateness and dissociation and further splitting becomes the primary response to further trauma, stress, and other life circumstances. Further splitting and creation of dissociated states can occur at any point in life and it isn't necessary for a person to have passed through a certain life stage to have alters of that age. Identity states (alters) can be of any age, any race, any gender: they can be animals, inanimate objects, 'supernatural beings' - anything. They are whatever the dissociating child needs them to be. Even typical integrated people may have aspects of themselves that behave and think more maturely in certain situations. The difference in people with DID is that these mature aspects of self take on a separate, older identity. What they are NOT is actual people. For instance, you don't actually have a 40 year old woman living in your body, although you (and probably she) would likely argue differently! I know my some of my alts absolutely and uncategorically denied that they were anything other than 100% real, actual beings. But they are not - they are dissociated identity states of the person that is me.
Ok, so I never established a unified core because of the trauma when I was little. That allowed me to create others to face situations that were too difficult for me. So if I understand what you are saying, it is this lack of a unified core that continues to allow me to create other. It is not like something fragmented because it was not whole in the first place. Is it ever possible to unify my core this late in life? Or is that a developmental stage that has passed me by? And just a note: The 40 year old women doesn't know me. And I don't have people living in my head. I have thoughts and emotions that are real, they are a personal part of me,they protected me, So much so that I don't feel. And I want to feel. And I think they know it is time for me to feel. Most of them anyway. And my therapist and sites like this will help me get there.
Reply
Views: 1854

attentionThis is an old thread. You probably should not post your reply to it, as the original poster is unlikely to see it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® — Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.




 

My Support Forums

My Support Forums is the online community that was originally begun as the Psych Central Forums in 2001. It now runs as an independent self-help support group community for mental health, personality, and psychological issues and is overseen by a group of dedicated, caring volunteers from around the world.

 

Helplines and Lifelines

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Always consult your doctor or mental health professional before trying anything you read here.