![]() |
FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() Mapleton
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
sure, why not? i could use a little laugh.
|
![]() hamster-bamster
|
#128
|
||||
|
||||
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
I suggest the psychiatrist, less because of what you think about the "normalcy" of mast. and more because you're using confusing, circular arguments and jumping between positions.
That sounds a lot like formal thought disorder (E.G. borderline, bipolar mania (p), schizophrenia, or maybe autism-- although I doubt it is autism, here) I'll repeat... you need to speak to someone other than a few people on an internet forum, no matter how interesting and helpful we seem to be. Good luck. As I said, go get that psychiatric consult. |
![]() growlithing, hamster-bamster
|
#131
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
![]() hamster-bamster, Mapleton
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
How was that a response to my post? My post was about what seems to be unusually concrete thinking on your part. I did not say that you needed to be "pure".
read this about circumstantial thinking Mental status examination - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and this about the thought content Mental status examination - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (read especially about preoccupations) At any rate, no reading substitutes for a professional evaluation. |
![]() Mapleton
|
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() hamster-bamster
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
nobody knows is what i will think from now on. |
![]() Mapleton
|
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The part about self-centered was not by way of making a judgment of you but rather by way of observing what makes your thinking unusual. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes I admit that at some point I felt like I was seriously important, but not anymore. that happened when I was bullied a lot and i thought that by exercising importance and being apathetic would help but no, i was wrong. |
![]() hamster-bamster
|
#141
|
||||
|
||||
But that's not how a conversation or a thread works. When we ask you a question we expect you to respond to the topic and not shift to whatever you are feeling at the moment. It is hard to understand you when you cannot answer our questions or respond appropriately. Like another member has said, you need to talk to a professional about your lapses in reasoning.
|
#142
|
||||
|
||||
Also, it is best to stick to the original topic, which is masturbation.
|
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Alright then.
|
#145
|
|||
|
|||
There is no point discussing it here. When you have somebody lined up, we can help you put together a collection of your statements that - to many people on the thread - demonstrate issues with your reasoning. Somebody calls them lapses, another person calls them circular, etc. - how they are called are not very important. The important part is seeing a professional.
|
#146
|
|||
|
|||
I am sorry the bullying happened to you.
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
it's alright. I want to move on already. My reasoning does kind of lapse because I cannot organize my thoughts on this site. Should I write them out before I express them? LOL.
|
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe that, and diagramming would help, too. How one idea leads to the next, premise+premise tie together, conclusion gets formed, etc. Might help, indeed.
|
#149
|
|||
|
|||
I'll bet. and even when i'm writing papers for someone, i feel like jumping from one topic to another. and if I don't know much about a topic, then i wont research it. instead i will try to BS my way out of it. Well, that has not been proven to achieve desired results.
|
![]() hamster-bamster
|
#150
|
||||
|
||||
Back on the topic of masturbation. When do women call it quits? I mean you can have multiple orgasms so do you go until your hand gets tired? (or the batteries die?)
__________________
"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." |
Reply |
|